14,549
edits
Forum:Staff Reorganization and the Goblet of...wait: Difference between revisions
Forum:Staff Reorganization and the Goblet of...wait (edit)
Revision as of 17:30, 22 July 2010
, 13 years agono edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
{{KrytenKoro|The rights you're listing (along with the also-needed deletion) are the main tools of the admin, though. The other tools, such as blocking, are only infrequently needed. As long as we all agree that we need more editors with these powers, I think the simplest and best solution is to just elect more admins.}} | {{KrytenKoro|The rights you're listing (along with the also-needed deletion) are the main tools of the admin, though. The other tools, such as blocking, are only infrequently needed. As long as we all agree that we need more editors with these powers, I think the simplest and best solution is to just elect more admins.}} | ||
{{R&D|time=16:53, July 22, 2010 (UTC)|yes=I agree with everything KK proposed and with Bluer ideas of more rights for mods.}} | {{R&D|time=16:53, July 22, 2010 (UTC)|yes=I agree with everything KK proposed and with Bluer ideas of more rights for mods.}} | ||
{{DTN|time=17:30, July 22, 2010 (UTC)|text=I oppose the suggestion of granting these rights to moderators. KrytenKoro states my main point in saying that these are the main tools of an administrator. If we give these abilities to moderators, there will hardly be any difference between admins and moderators, just mainly banning and deleting. If we make the abilities of our entire staff more homogeneous, the position of the administrator is weakened, and the users who are already complaining that the staff "rules the wiki" shall have one more thing to complain about, since since we are giving what used to be just "glorified editors" many extra administrative functions. On the contrary, I fully support the addition of several new admins.}} | |||