3,310
edits
Forum:IRC Profanity Filter - again: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Also, your approach to the issue is essentially that the non-PG rule is upseting you and other unnamed, unconfirmed users that we have no evidence of being real or not. Since you cannot find a solution to the problem, you immediately decide that we should open the option to just get rid of that rule, so that it works better for you and the possibly unreal people. By the creation of this forum about a topic related to possibly removing the non-PG rule and the profanity filter, it is pretty obvious that you wish for this to happen, if the decision was up to you. To continue, this approach says of you that you cannot solve the problem, so let's just get rid of it. That is, in all seriousness, absolutely ridiculous. If you cannot solve the issue, the solution is not to just get rid of it. That just pushes the problem away and solves nothing; one or more of the involved parties will not be satisified.<!--Of course, none of this applies to shutting down the IRC Channel, which should be shut down regardless of the situation, since all other solutions have failed and this is the only remaining one.-->}} | Also, your approach to the issue is essentially that the non-PG rule is upseting you and other unnamed, unconfirmed users that we have no evidence of being real or not. Since you cannot find a solution to the problem, you immediately decide that we should open the option to just get rid of that rule, so that it works better for you and the possibly unreal people. By the creation of this forum about a topic related to possibly removing the non-PG rule and the profanity filter, it is pretty obvious that you wish for this to happen, if the decision was up to you. To continue, this approach says of you that you cannot solve the problem, so let's just get rid of it. That is, in all seriousness, absolutely ridiculous. If you cannot solve the issue, the solution is not to just get rid of it. That just pushes the problem away and solves nothing; one or more of the involved parties will not be satisified.<!--Of course, none of this applies to shutting down the IRC Channel, which should be shut down regardless of the situation, since all other solutions have failed and this is the only remaining one.-->}} | ||
{{LA|Vtext=Interesting theory. Incorrect, but interesting. Well thought out. You're attempting to read my actions and justify them in your own way. That's a very clever way to break someone down psychologically. Unfortunately, your attempt failed, and I am not thwarted. | |||
I am not going to rave and rant about how hypocritical you are being right now. Instead, I have the following thing to say: | |||
What's your point? That is simply a list of reasons against me, and, frankly, ''that'' is not helping anything. You have only gone down to the same low everyone on the IRC had escalated too. What a great example to set. Good day. | |||
<!--That is about the funniest joke I've heard all day. There are several possibilities to explore when it comes to fixing the channel, and simply deleting it is cowardly. At least I'm conducting a bit of research as to why the Profanity Filter could be removed, but, frankly, it's leaning the other way.-->}} | |||