14,549
edits
Forum:Featured Articles: Difference between revisions
→February 2010
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
==February 2010== | ==February 2010== | ||
{{BebopKate|time=23:27, January 1, 2010 (UTC)|text=So I was thinking we should work on making some article-types feature-worthy so we can use them as examples of what a good article for that type is like. One type we haven't featured yet and I think needs some work is Keyblades; these seem to vary wildly in quality sometimes. Are there any we have that anyone thinks close of being feature-worthy, and if so, what do we need to do to make it better?}} | {{BebopKate|time=23:27, January 1, 2010 (UTC)|text=So I was thinking we should work on making some article-types feature-worthy so we can use them as examples of what a good article for that type is like. One type we haven't featured yet and I think needs some work is Keyblades; these seem to vary wildly in quality sometimes. Are there any we have that anyone thinks close of being feature-worthy, and if so, what do we need to do to make it better?}} | ||
{{DTN|time=02:34, January 2, 2010 (UTC)|text=Sorry to butt in, but one of the issues with the Keyblade articles as a whole is that many of them lack basic information. I'm speaking specifically about the Keyblades introduced in ''Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days''. That's my main concern with Keyblade articles. Otherwise, KrytenKoro and NeutraVega put together a new infobox for the Keyblades that merges the card incarnations from ''Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories'' in with the stats from the main console games. We no longer will need an entirely seperate infobox just for the Keyblade's card, and I find that to be a helpful improvement to the Keyblade articles.}} | |||