Forum:Podcast expansion proposal: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 71: Line 71:
:In case I haven't been clear in my comments, at Chaser: By all means, none of this is possible without your great contribution. If you do not want to work on any of it, do not feel compelled to do so. What all/how much happens with the podcast is dictated by how much you and the other Roundtable folks are willing to do. No one will fault you guys for doing less. While I do not completely know/understand everything there is to editing this stuff, I do know it requires a lot of time and work. Mere words cannot express our thanks for all the effort you've put forth in this. I apologize if I seemed pressing in my previous comments. {{User:Xion4ever/Sig}} 03:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
:In case I haven't been clear in my comments, at Chaser: By all means, none of this is possible without your great contribution. If you do not want to work on any of it, do not feel compelled to do so. What all/how much happens with the podcast is dictated by how much you and the other Roundtable folks are willing to do. No one will fault you guys for doing less. While I do not completely know/understand everything there is to editing this stuff, I do know it requires a lot of time and work. Mere words cannot express our thanks for all the effort you've put forth in this. I apologize if I seemed pressing in my previous comments. {{User:Xion4ever/Sig}} 03:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
::Absolutely no pressure, dude. Whatever you don't want to do, you don't have to do. If it helps, "special episode" would only be special content-wise, and if it's a "ten minute featurette", then maybe that means it takes less work...?  --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 03:42, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
::Absolutely no pressure, dude. Whatever you don't want to do, you don't have to do. If it helps, "special episode" would only be special content-wise, and if it's a "ten minute featurette", then maybe that means it takes less work...?  --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 03:42, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
{{KeybladeSpyMaster|time=06:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)|default2=I'd like to add my couple cents to the conversation had today. First of all, and perhaps most importantly, no, the foul language isn't necessary as it was used today. Remember that we're a wiki covering a series made for children <u>as well</u> as us not-as-young fans. Guess who will likely come to the wiki? Children. And while they will undoubtedly hear that language as time goes on, I don't think it's a good image for us to be using that language, especially considering the situation. I mean, seriously, we're talking about a measly topic for the podcast. I realize you guys have other ideas/beliefs concerning the use of foul language, but I don't think this situation merits its use anyways. I tell this to Byz, and now I tell you guys, we're editing a wiki where none of us are getting paid. Our livelihoods aren't at stake here for us to get so darn ticked-off and emotionally-charged. Seriously, I strongly believe the use/implication of a swear word was inappropriate here.
Don't get me wrong, I don't believe the podcast is the place for discussing the DisneyWiki, like, at all. The podcast is a discussion on the ''Kingdom Hearts'' series. It should discuss the series, the thoughts of those doing the podcast concerning the series, etc. Maybe even the wiki and recent events on it. We should definitely discuss Disney, but as it relates to the series, and many of the topics Byz posted are good ideas to discuss as they relate to the series (will they show up in the series, would it be a good idea, etc.). But the DisneyWiki isn't a topic up for discussion, in anyway. The DisneyWiki-related issues seem to be more fit for a forum or the Roundtable. Something significantly more formal than the podcast.
I agree with Xion, and I add my voice to hers in repeating these thoughts. I would sure hope you guys (especially you, Chaser) don't feel obligated to do the podcast. It's something we'd love to see, but I personally don't want to pressure you guys to do it if you can't. Like, if it's too much work for you, Chaser, then don't. I'd rather see a podcast every three months than every month and cause Chaser to get sick of the pressur and give up. Then what would we do? So, really, it's up to you guys if you want to do it, you who are doing the podcast. As for how it relates/ties to the Magazine, I think we should do a more news-themed podcast to tie with the Magazine, and then let it all as you wish for the others. Something like having the Magazine-tied episode summarize the news of the last three months, and a discussion of all of the news as a whole. As opposed to the episodes between the magazine releases, which could cover recent news, it wouldn't be all the news since the last magazine. Plus, those special episodes would be more fun and fan-related, as compared to the news-themed episode tied with the magazine. But that's my thoughts on it. '''Again, the big thing here is whether you want to/can. If you don't want to/can't, than don't, and we'll all be fine with one every three months.'''}}