25,137
edits
Forum:New staff elections - 2011: Difference between revisions
Forum:New staff elections - 2011 (view source)
Revision as of 01:37, 18 February 2011
, 13 years ago→Discussion
Chitalian8 (talk | contribs) |
NinjaSheik (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
The point is, Ninja, you're more fit to be an administrator than you may think. And you already have four votes, compared to the one vote you expected. People think you can be an admin, so... show 'em how it's done!}} | The point is, Ninja, you're more fit to be an administrator than you may think. And you already have four votes, compared to the one vote you expected. People think you can be an admin, so... show 'em how it's done!}} | ||
{{NinjaSheik|text=Thanks, guys, but still...Admins are practically the one who rules the wiki. And with that said, I repsect that you think I'm fit in for the position, but as admins, it is your job to run the wiki and see it is run smoothly. Not only that, they have the abilities to promote other users to mod or admins, like themselves. However, the process of actually promoting a user up a rank takes time, and not only that the user who is nomiated must have the nescessary...requirements to be promoted. I think the admins is like...the chairman board, like in a school, who dicuss things before they announce their decisions, which lead me to believe that other admins might disagree about your decision on me. I know tihs just "nominating" right now, but when you think about, even nominating someone, who may or may not meet the requirements, could lead to a lot of problems. | |||
Oh, and more thing, I'm not the type that "jumps the hurdle". I am a introvert, who leared that staying in the background is a lot more safe then flying into something reckless. Plus, I am kinda inscure, just a little bit.}} | |||