3,053
edits
Chitalian8 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
SilverCrono (talk | contribs) m (→February 2011) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
**Also try to provide variety in your nomination--our goal is to balance out the "demographic" of articles above, not add more character articles. | **Also try to provide variety in your nomination--our goal is to balance out the "demographic" of articles above, not add more character articles. | ||
==March 2011== | |||
==February 2011== | ==February 2011== | ||
{{LightRoxas|tron=So, I've read the posts below, and it looks like this is now open to non-staff. If I'm correct, then I'd like to nominate [[Aqua]] for February. Here's why: | {{LightRoxas|tron=So, I've read the posts below, and it looks like this is now open to non-staff. If I'm correct, then I'd like to nominate [[Aqua]] for February. Here's why: | ||
Line 50: | Line 51: | ||
:::I also agree, but would you all say the article is high-quality enough to be the Featured Article? It looks good to me, just wanted to make sure. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 01:20, January 25, 2011 (UTC) | :::I also agree, but would you all say the article is high-quality enough to be the Featured Article? It looks good to me, just wanted to make sure. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 01:20, January 25, 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::I personally am all for it, it's something new, something that's not overly cliche, sounds good to me--{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 05:58, February 1, 2011 (UTC) | ::::I personally am all for it, it's something new, something that's not overly cliche, sounds good to me--{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 05:58, February 1, 2011 (UTC) | ||
'''''Verdict: [[Ultima Weapon]] !''''' | |||
==January 2011== | ==January 2011== |
edits