KHWiki:Votes for featured articles: Difference between revisions

m
No edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:
**Also try to provide variety in your nomination--our goal is to balance out the "demographic" of articles above, not add more character articles.  
**Also try to provide variety in your nomination--our goal is to balance out the "demographic" of articles above, not add more character articles.  


==March 2011==
==February 2011==
==February 2011==
{{LightRoxas|tron=So, I've read the posts below, and it looks like this is now open to non-staff. If I'm correct, then I'd like to nominate [[Aqua]] for February. Here's why:
{{LightRoxas|tron=So, I've read the posts below, and it looks like this is now open to non-staff. If I'm correct, then I'd like to nominate [[Aqua]] for February. Here's why:
Line 50: Line 51:
:::I also agree, but would you all say the article is high-quality enough to be the Featured Article? It looks good to me, just wanted to make sure. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 01:20, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
:::I also agree, but would you all say the article is high-quality enough to be the Featured Article? It looks good to me, just wanted to make sure. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 01:20, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
::::I personally am all for it, it's something new, something that's not overly cliche, sounds good to me--{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 05:58, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
::::I personally am all for it, it's something new, something that's not overly cliche, sounds good to me--{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 05:58, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
'''''Verdict: [[Ultima Weapon]] !'''''


==January 2011==
==January 2011==
3,053

edits