10,134
edits
User talk:Webber22: Difference between revisions
→"Now, is this not the smart and rational thing to do at this point?"
| Line 223: | Line 223: | ||
::::Can we seriously please not further indulge in off-wiki drama? Webber's complaint about it does not need to be humored in any way.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 21:53, 1 June 2016 (UTC) | ::::Can we seriously please not further indulge in off-wiki drama? Webber's complaint about it does not need to be humored in any way.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 21:53, 1 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::I give you my word regarding the whole "interaction ban" thing. The second I break that word, do as you see fit. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 02:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | :::::I give you my word regarding the whole "interaction ban" thing. The second I break that word, do as you see fit. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 02:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
I completely oppose an "interaction ban", it's the most ridiculous idea. The wiki should ''not'' appease the childish behaviour of someone, who is incapable of showing restraint in front of a person he dislikes (for whatever bizarre reason that hatred stems from). If you haven't learnt how to work with people you don't get along with, don't come here. An interaction ban is very impractical, as TSH said, and enforcing something like that would eventually create more drama and an unhappy, tense atmosphere that will drive people away from the wiki. The criteria for you returning to the wiki was a serious resolve to change ''yourself'' to avoid the same mistakes. However, your recent messages have taken away my optimism that you might do this. After a long passage of time, you ''might'' (and I say that without much faith) change your way of thinking. Therefore, I advocate that the ''minimum'' length of the ban should still be a year. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 14:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | |||