361
edits
User talk:Webber22: Difference between revisions
→"Now, is this not the smart and rational thing to do at this point?"
| Line 225: | Line 225: | ||
I completely oppose an "interaction ban", it's the most ridiculous idea. The wiki should ''not'' appease the childish behaviour of someone, who is incapable of showing restraint in front of a person he dislikes (for whatever bizarre reason that hatred stems from). If you haven't learnt how to work with people you don't get along with, don't come here. An interaction ban is very impractical, as TSH said, and enforcing something like that would eventually create more drama and an unhappy, tense atmosphere that will drive people away from the wiki. The criteria for you returning to the wiki was a serious resolve to change ''yourself'' to avoid the same mistakes. However, your recent messages have taken away my optimism that you might do this. After a long passage of time, you ''might'' (and I say that without much faith) change your way of thinking. Therefore, I advocate that the ''minimum'' length of the ban should still be a year. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 14:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | I completely oppose an "interaction ban", it's the most ridiculous idea. The wiki should ''not'' appease the childish behaviour of someone, who is incapable of showing restraint in front of a person he dislikes (for whatever bizarre reason that hatred stems from). If you haven't learnt how to work with people you don't get along with, don't come here. An interaction ban is very impractical, as TSH said, and enforcing something like that would eventually create more drama and an unhappy, tense atmosphere that will drive people away from the wiki. The criteria for you returning to the wiki was a serious resolve to change ''yourself'' to avoid the same mistakes. However, your recent messages have taken away my optimism that you might do this. After a long passage of time, you ''might'' (and I say that without much faith) change your way of thinking. Therefore, I advocate that the ''minimum'' length of the ban should still be a year. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 14:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
:So you basically advocate a ban based solely on your personal paranoia...--[[Special:Contributions/68.200.71.21|68.200.71.21]] 15:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | :So you basically advocate a ban based solely on your personal paranoia...--[[Special:Contributions/68.200.71.21|68.200.71.21]] 15:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
Screw it. Debating this is doing no one any good. It's exhausting. So all interested parties, just....tell me what you want, and you'll have it. :( I can't get anything done like this. Even the Unchained updates have suffered. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 02:16, 3 June 2016 (UTC) | |||