361
edits
User talk:NinjaSheik: Difference between revisions
→Response
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 231: | Line 231: | ||
And then - THEN! - someone here has this magical audacity to give me a WONDERFUL choice. Truly wonderful: Apologize over something that you ''know'' I didn't even do, and then ''get banned only a little bit'', or don't apologize and ''get banned a whole lot!'' I'm sorry, what the FUCK kind of choice is that? Again with the metaphor - if you drown, you're not a witch, if you live, then you're a witch so we'll have to kill you anyway! | And then - THEN! - someone here has this magical audacity to give me a WONDERFUL choice. Truly wonderful: Apologize over something that you ''know'' I didn't even do, and then ''get banned only a little bit'', or don't apologize and ''get banned a whole lot!'' I'm sorry, what the FUCK kind of choice is that? Again with the metaphor - if you drown, you're not a witch, if you live, then you're a witch so we'll have to kill you anyway! | ||
I was asked to speak for myself, so here I am. Speaking for myself, and choosing for myself. I ''choose'' not to apologize. And I ''choose'' not option A, or even B, but I'm proposing this RIDICULOUS new Option C called "Let's not ban Webber. At all." Instead, I'm gonna go on my merry. You're all gonna go on your merry. When an edit or contribution needs to be done, it'll be done. When a proposition crops up, it'll get discussed - and nothing more to it than that. And just because I don't mince words regarding foolish people undertaking foolish actions does not give leeway for you all to | I was asked to speak for myself, so here I am. Speaking for myself, and choosing for myself. I ''choose'' not to apologize. And I ''choose'' not option A, or even B, but I'm proposing this RIDICULOUS new Option C called "Let's not ban Webber. At all." Instead, I'm gonna go on my merry. You're all gonna go on your merry. When an edit or contribution needs to be done, it'll be done. When a proposition crops up, it'll get discussed - and nothing more to it than that. And just because I don't mince words regarding foolish people undertaking foolish actions does not give leeway for you all to get hilariously, heart-bleedingly overly-sensitive and assume someone is ''attacking you''. Because by golly, ''you are perfect''. No, a tap on the shoulder asking what time it is is not aggravated assault. And no, giving you a smile and telling you "good morning!" is not sexual harassment in the office. ''Get over yourselves''. The victimization routine only goes so far. | ||
Now, as I said before, I will not proceed to go on my merry and proceed as normal. In fact, I'm pretty much gonna try and forget this absolutely ridiculous and stupid discussion never even happened. Actually, I strongly suggest you delete it and be done with it, since all it does is serve to make all of us here look like a bunch of uptight wankers arguing over a useless bunch of nothing, and starting drama over a whole lot of zero. And most of us - let's face it - have had that happen just a bit too much. Now, is this not the smart and rational thing to do at this point? --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 03:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC) | Now, as I said before, I will not proceed to go on my merry and proceed as normal. In fact, I'm pretty much gonna try and forget this absolutely ridiculous and stupid discussion never even happened. Actually, I strongly suggest you delete it and be done with it, since all it does is serve to make all of us here look like a bunch of uptight wankers arguing over a useless bunch of nothing, and starting drama over a whole lot of zero. And most of us - let's face it - have had that happen just a bit too much. Now, is this not the smart and rational thing to do at this point? --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 03:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC) | ||