361
edits
User talk:NinjaSheik: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
NinjaSheik (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
::::::::We should get on with it. Being the neutral admins in support of this idea, I think either TSH or KK should ban the user and notify him of that. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 22:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC) | ::::::::We should get on with it. Being the neutral admins in support of this idea, I think either TSH or KK should ban the user and notify him of that. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 22:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::Agreed.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 19:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC) | :::::::::Agreed.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 19:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
The mighty NinjaSheik has spoken. But of course ''she'' believes I'm a lost cause. Now, before I, I don't know, submit myself to judgment, I present a query: On how many sites do you think ''she'' has been banned on for "attacking users?" Now, to make this fair, we'll limit it to ''just'' attacks on users - we won't include anything crazy like pseudo-modding, harassing, trolling, drama queen-ing....you know, the routine. And also to make it fair, I'll just keep it to the Kingdom Hearts community. Now, here's a hint: ''A lot more times than I've been banned on here''. And secondly, and this is a rather important clarification, I've only personally been banned on here ''twice'', and that was some time ago. So....not ''five''. A while ago, I used a campus network (no longer the case) - you may feel free to check up on the IP - a particular pest was savvy on fucking around with me back then (though to be fair, some of it was my fair - I didn't make use of TOR, partially because I didn't know about it, and because it would've been too slow on the network). And that's just me and my very-much-not-friend. I can't speak for any other assholes who might have caused a stirrup. | |||
So to recap, I've only personally been banned twice on here - and again, some time ago. Secondly, Shiek is literally the LAST person on earth to go around and dig up someone's past history, criticize them, dismiss them, and then ''judge'' them given her ''very'' colorful history. By that logic, Charles Manson should be appointed to the Supreme Court. | |||
And lastly, regarding this "incident" - am I apologetic about it? ....''Not really''. This is the part where I ask points for honesty....but I don't have to since I already ''have'' a point. Go ahead - look at every discussion between myself and NJ. I have ''never'' attacked her - merely ''pointed out'' the hypocrisy in her actions. If that constitutes as an attack, then I'm sorry Kryten, but your suggestion to make everyone an admin just as easily labels you as having a ''drinking problem''. Unfit to rule, and operate heavy machinery! Doesn't make a whole lot of sense, does it? So, why do I have to apologize for something that doesn't even make sense? | |||
And then - THEN! - someone here has this magical audacity to give me a WONDERFUL choice. Truly wonderful: Apologize over something that you ''know'' I didn't even do, and then ''get banned only a little bit'', or don't apologize and ''get banned a whole lot!'' I'm sorry, what the FUCK kind of choice is that? Again with the metaphor - if you drown, you're not a witch, if you live, then you're a witch so we'll have to kill you anyway! | |||
I was asked to speak for myself, so here I am. Speaking for myself, and choosing for myself. I ''choose'' not to apologize. And I ''choose'' not option A, or even B, but I'm proposing this RIDICULOUS new Option C called "Let's not ban Webber. At all." Instead, I'm gonna go on my merry. You're all gonna go on your merry. When an edit or contribution needs to be done, it'll be done. When a proposition crops up, it'll get discussed - and nothing more to it than that. And just because I don't mince words regarding foolish people undertaking foolish actions does not give leeway for you all to actually hilariously, heart-bleedingly sensitive and assume someone is attacking you. Because by golly, ''you are perfect''. | |||
Now, as I said before, I will not proceed to go on my merry and proceed as normal. In fact, I'm pretty much gonna try and forget this absolutely ridiculous and stupid discussion never even happened. Actually, I strongly suggest you delete it and be done with it, since all it does is serve to make all of us here look like a bunch of uptight wankers arguing over a useless bunch of nothing, and starting drama over a whole lot of zero. And most of us - let's face it - have had that happen just a bit too much. Now, is this not the smart and rational thing to do at this point? --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 03:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Fighting style == | == Fighting style == | ||