User talk:KrytenKoro/Archive 12: Difference between revisions

mistake. sorry
(mistake. sorry)
Line 544: Line 544:
A lot have been released online, albeit as low-quality scans. Would you say we can still use these in our articles? I'm concerned about the ones which would serve as a particular article's "main image." I can upload as many renders as I can when I get home from work tonight, but I would like to know how you feel about this: Lady Junky uploaded the Dark Riku official render, but her attempt to remove the background leaves much to be desired (mainly because the color of Riku's hair matches the scan background). Would you say we should remove the backgrounds (may take some time), or would the backgrounds included be okay for now? Obviously, we would use <nowiki>{{betterpic}}</nowiki>... - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 16:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
A lot have been released online, albeit as low-quality scans. Would you say we can still use these in our articles? I'm concerned about the ones which would serve as a particular article's "main image." I can upload as many renders as I can when I get home from work tonight, but I would like to know how you feel about this: Lady Junky uploaded the Dark Riku official render, but her attempt to remove the background leaves much to be desired (mainly because the color of Riku's hair matches the scan background). Would you say we should remove the backgrounds (may take some time), or would the backgrounds included be okay for now? Obviously, we would use <nowiki>{{betterpic}}</nowiki>... - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 16:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
:I would think we're definitely going to get better pics once shard gets his copy, so I don't mind either way.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 16:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
:I would think we're definitely going to get better pics once shard gets his copy, so I don't mind either way.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 16:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
::Ah gotcha. Would the physical form be considered separate since it's technically listed as "Sora" in the journal? --[[User:Vanitas|Vanitas]] ([[User talk:Vanitas|talk]]) 17:30, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


== Sora Heartless ==
== Sora Heartless ==
Line 550: Line 549:
Sora's Heartless: Shadow/Neo Darkside/AntiSora forms are covered on the list, but his state after recovering his physical form is not. --[[User:Vanitas|Vanitas]] ([[User talk:Vanitas|talk]]) 16:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Sora's Heartless: Shadow/Neo Darkside/AntiSora forms are covered on the list, but his state after recovering his physical form is not. --[[User:Vanitas|Vanitas]] ([[User talk:Vanitas|talk]]) 16:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
:Those forms are treated as separate physical entities, even though they stem from the same source, by the ultimania.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 17:17, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
:Those forms are treated as separate physical entities, even though they stem from the same source, by the ultimania.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 17:17, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
::Ah gotcha. Would the physical form be considered separate since it's technically listed as "Sora" in the journal? --[[User:Vanitas|Vanitas]] ([[User talk:Vanitas|talk]]) 17:30, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
599

edits