10,134
edits
User talk:Chainoffire: Difference between revisions
→The Judging Process: new section
Chainoffire (talk | contribs) |
(→The Judging Process: new section) |
||
| Line 401: | Line 401: | ||
:Progress check, please! {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 23:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC) | :Progress check, please! {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 23:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
:Working on intro to, game tasks and mailbag. Page fourteen the framework has begun. Interview would like to be dropped, but I'll try to pump one out if possible. {{User:Chainoffire/sig}} 08:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC) | :Working on intro to, game tasks and mailbag. Page fourteen the framework has begun. Interview would like to be dropped, but I'll try to pump one out if possible. {{User:Chainoffire/sig}} 08:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
== The Judging Process == | |||
{{TheFifteenthMember|time={{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 01:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)|default=About the judging process, what feedback is going to be given? Is it just going to be the scores or will comments and critiques also be included? Personally, I like comments so I know what people liked and what I need to work on, but I understand not everyone may see it the same way. If you do include comments, would they be mandatory? That would make sure everyone gets a piece of feedback but it would also mean that judges may delay to hand in their responses. Lastly, if you do comments, will the scores be revealed anonymously or not? While I'd like seeing comments alongside their scores, the knowledge that your critiques will be public could pressure them into scoring nicely, which we don't want (or do we?). | |||
I don't know what way I'd set it up, because each decision has pros and cons, but it's up to you. Good work with the event so far and I look forward to the finale!}} | |||