25,122
edits
User talk:71.222.103.177: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→Roxas) |
NinjaSheik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
No, that ''does'' change the fact that doesn't because, because while it ''is'' a published depiction of Roxas, there is still literally nothing suggesting this was ever a thing besides fandom speculation. I have checked, it literally is not a thing except for you guys. No Nomura interviews suggesting there was an older Roxas intended to play a role, no behind the scenes concept art. This is an isolated incident and if you actually follow both how Nomura's artstyle was at the time and how art composition works, you would know it was probably not an intentional thing. I've drawn characters looking older than they should simply by virtue of using a different pose or by accidentally adding some details that age them up. That's how art works. | No, that ''does'' change the fact that doesn't because, because while it ''is'' a published depiction of Roxas, there is still literally nothing suggesting this was ever a thing besides fandom speculation. I have checked, it literally is not a thing except for you guys. No Nomura interviews suggesting there was an older Roxas intended to play a role, no behind the scenes concept art. This is an isolated incident and if you actually follow both how Nomura's artstyle was at the time and how art composition works, you would know it was probably not an intentional thing. I've drawn characters looking older than they should simply by virtue of using a different pose or by accidentally adding some details that age them up. That's how art works. | ||
Furthermore, this is not pertinent information that needs to be included in the section related to Roxas' appearance, both by virtue of the lack of canonical backing and it's fan speculation status. You guys stubbornly keep this here even though it does not fit. If you *must* have it, then it should be saved for the Trivia section. That's what Trivia is meant for, putting information that otherwise doesn't fit anywhere else. And this is exactly what it is '''fan speculation and trivia'''. | Furthermore, this is not pertinent information that needs to be included in the section related to Roxas' appearance, both by virtue of the lack of canonical backing and it's fan speculation status. You guys stubbornly keep this here even though it does not fit. If you *must* have it, then it should be saved for the Trivia section. That's what Trivia is meant for, putting information that otherwise doesn't fit anywhere else. And this is exactly what it is '''fan speculation and trivia'''.{{unsigned|71.222.103.177}} | ||