User talk:173.28.36.57: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Kryten gave a reason why he reverted it in his edit summary. That's good enough. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 20:13, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Kryten gave a reason why he reverted it in his edit summary. That's good enough. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 20:13, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
:Kryten's point was valid. He simply said that the points you added were debatable and involved opinions, so should be left out altogether. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 05:23, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
:Kryten's point was valid. He simply said that the points you added were debatable and involved opinions, so should be left out altogether. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 05:23, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
::Ok, well that's '''not''' what I meant. But anyway, if you want to argue the point you do so on the talk page. You don't revert the edit simply because he didn't discuss on the talk page first. In most cases an editor reverts an edit with a point everyone agrees with and the case is ended. If a one person doesn't agree, he leaves the edit for the time being and then discusses on a talk page. If I'm wrong, can someone correct me? {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 20:50, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
10,134

edits