Talk:Removed content: Difference between revisions

Line 170: Line 170:
== "censorship" ==
== "censorship" ==


Realized that having a conversation in the edit description is a terrible way to go about things, so I'm leaving this here. Calling Aqua's clothing change "censorship" is extremely misleading because censorship in most cases only refers to a higher body. In this context that would refer to an executive at Square Enix, a government, Sony, or something like that. "Censorship" in colloquial use, referring to "covering" literally anything, is not usually used when talking about decisions related to the publication of a work. Especially the sentence "due to censorship" makes absolutely 0 sense, because it seems to refer to censorship as a "force" rather than citing the events surrounding the change. To my knowledge, Nomura made the decision to cover up Aqua's clothing entirely on his own, for whatever reason. If this is not the case, then the details regarding what led to the change should be put in to clarify the situation, otherwise putting the word "censorship" there is very confusing and leads people to believe that somebody other than Nomura made the decision. -A ((unsigned|67.168.190.229}}
Realized that having a conversation in the edit description is a terrible way to go about things, so I'm leaving this here. Calling Aqua's clothing change "censorship" is extremely misleading because censorship in most cases only refers to a higher body. In this context that would refer to an executive at Square Enix, a government, Sony, or something like that. "Censorship" in colloquial use, referring to "covering" literally anything, is not usually used when talking about decisions related to the publication of a work. Especially the sentence "due to censorship" makes absolutely 0 sense, because it seems to refer to censorship as a "force" rather than citing the events surrounding the change. To my knowledge, Nomura made the decision to cover up Aqua's clothing entirely on his own, for whatever reason. If this is not the case, then the details regarding what led to the change should be put in to clarify the situation, otherwise putting the word "censorship" there is very confusing and leads people to believe that somebody other than Nomura made the decision. -A {{unsigned|67.168.190.229}}
:I've revised the passage to use the term "self-censorhip", which is what it's called when an author modifies a part of their work out of concern for society's sensibilities.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 01:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
:I've revised the passage to use the term "self-censorhip", which is what it's called when an author modifies a part of their work out of concern for society's sensibilities.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 01:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
25,122

edits