53,710
edits
Talk:Heartless: Difference between revisions
→Oogie's Manor and other possible Heartless
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 474: | Line 474: | ||
:I see it as more of an artificial Nobody, as it lacks a Heart. And despite being a TCG collector myself (I got my first deck yesterday), I don't consider the cards as canon. {{Uxie/Sig}} 17:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC) | :I see it as more of an artificial Nobody, as it lacks a Heart. And despite being a TCG collector myself (I got my first deck yesterday), I don't consider the cards as canon. {{Uxie/Sig}} 17:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
But the description in the pause too say "Artificial Heartless" so is not only the card--[[Special:Contributions/2.40.142.25|2.40.142.25]] 17:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC) | But the description in the pause too say "Artificial Heartless" so is not only the card--[[Special:Contributions/2.40.142.25|2.40.142.25]] 17:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
:1: the cards have a fuckton of errors, we aren't citing them. 2: artificial means something, and 3: there's more to being a heartless than just | :1: the cards have a fuckton of errors, we aren't citing them. 2: artificial means something, and 3: there's more to being a heartless than just acting like you lack a heart, and the experiment doesn't qualify. Scar himself is an edge case because he's ''undergoing'' the process of becoming a heartless, just like beast or sora. The groundshaker is the heartless, and id honestly argue that scar should be removed considering how the manga clarifies what pete is doing.[[Special:Contributions/107.35.129.24|107.35.129.24]] 18:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC) | ||