KHWiki:Community Portal/Archive I: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
I'm wondering about titles for the [[Organization]] members; should the page titles be just the name, or the full name and "title" they carry? Here's screenshots of both possibilites for the [[Axel]] article: | I'm wondering about titles for the [[Organization]] members; should the page titles be just the name, or the full name and "title" they carry? Here's screenshots of both possibilites for the [[Axel]] article: | ||
<font size="+1">Images have since been deleted</font> | |||
What does everyone think? [[User:Scottch|Scottch]] 09:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | What does everyone think? [[User:Scottch|Scottch]] 09:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 66: | Line 59: | ||
:::::=/ [[User:Interrobang|Interrobang]] 08:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | :::::=/ [[User:Interrobang|Interrobang]] 08:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
If we're still going to show suspicion for admin volunteers, I wouldn't be confident in Dreyfus, with his apparent knack for speculation and bizarre contributions. Things like | If we're still going to show suspicion for admin volunteers, I wouldn't be confident in Dreyfus, with his apparent knack for speculation and bizarre contributions. Things like ''Template:Maleficent2'', [[:Category:Magic Heartless]], or [http://kingdomhearts.wikia.com/index.php?title=Heartless&oldid=2720], all of which have no place in actual canon, don't exactly make me brim with respect for Dreyfus. I'd prefer he learned to separate his own ideas from what the games actually say before becoming a judge. [[User:Interrobang|Interrobang]] 13:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
:More on this in a bit, but I just want to point out that admins are not content judges. As I understand, they are around to assist new people, prevent disruption, and facilitate collaborative editing. Dreyfus has been more than responsive to concerns I've brought up in the past. Perhaps you'd have similar luck if you brought your article concerns to him. [[User:Scottch|Scottch]] 13:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | :More on this in a bit, but I just want to point out that admins are not content judges. As I understand, they are around to assist new people, prevent disruption, and facilitate collaborative editing. Dreyfus has been more than responsive to concerns I've brought up in the past. Perhaps you'd have similar luck if you brought your article concerns to him. [[User:Scottch|Scottch]] 13:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
::I'd still prefer it if admins didn't violate basic content policy. Otherwise sets a bad example, as admins are supposed to be the models for users to aspire to. Even if they're theoretically only supposed to do what you say, they're realistically more than that. [[User:Interrobang|Interrobang]] 13:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | ::I'd still prefer it if admins didn't violate basic content policy. Otherwise sets a bad example, as admins are supposed to be the models for users to aspire to. Even if they're theoretically only supposed to do what you say, they're realistically more than that. [[User:Interrobang|Interrobang]] 13:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 176: | Line 169: | ||
===Plowing ahead with this=== | ===Plowing ahead with this=== | ||
I haven't heard any objections, so I'm going to start tagging unsourced images with | I haven't heard any objections, so I'm going to start tagging unsourced images with ''Template:unsourcedpic'' and notifying uploaders. [[User:Scottch|Scottch]] 05:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Images revisited == | == Images revisited == | ||