3,310
edits
Forum:Wiki Management: Difference between revisions
It was probably ''me'' who was misconcieving here, but his comment sure sounded like ''this'' common misconception. Oh, and thanks, neumannz.
No edit summary |
(It was probably ''me'' who was misconcieving here, but his comment sure sounded like ''this'' common misconception. Oh, and thanks, neumannz.) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
{{Maggosh|flint=There aren't enough facepalms in the ''world''...}} | {{Maggosh|flint=There aren't enough facepalms in the ''world''...}} | ||
{{LA|Vtext=*slams head against desk repeatedly* | |||
Why is it that everyone's under the impression that "fan-based" means "fanon" and thus "fan-fiction" and thus "crap"? There is already a fanon wiki, even a bloody ''fan-fiction'' wiki. Hosting fanon material like that is pointless, as there are <span style="background-color:white">[http://kingdomheartsfanon.wikia.com/wiki/Kingdom_Hearts_Fanon_Wiki countless]</span> <span style="background-color:white">[http://kingdomheartscanonfanon.wikia.com/wiki/Kingdom_Hearts_Canon-Fanon_Wiki wikis]</span> <span style="background-color:white">[http://kingdomheartsfanfiction.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page exactly]</span> <span style="background-color:white">[http://kingdomheartsfan-fic.wikia.com/wiki/Kingdom_Hearts_Fan_Fic_Wiki for that purpose]</span>. The wiki won't need real preserving because we're not really going to change. We're just throwing in a more fan-based approach to the place, rather than a professional approach. Aya caramba, I might just have to make a whole forum centered around the distinct differences between "fanon" and "fan-based" if the misconception continues. | |||
<end of rant>}} | |||