Forum:Should there be a page for Fragmented Keys?: Difference between revisions

Forum:Should there be a page for Fragmented Keys? (edit)

Revision as of 20:07, 29 April 2016

3 bytes added , 8 years ago

no edit summary

Webber22

361

edits

Revision as of 20:07, 29 April 2016 (edit) Webber22 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:07, 29 April 2016 (edit) (undo) Webber22 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 68:		Line 68:

	:::::::The evidence that I outlined a few posts up is absolutely solid, I see no reason to doubt it. If it was a single piece of evidence, maybe, but we have multiple sources of evidence that can all be cross-referenced, and that are all very solid if you look into it. --[[User:DChiuch\|DChiuch]] ([[User talk:DChiuch\|talk]]) 17:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)		:::::::The evidence that I outlined a few posts up is absolutely solid, I see no reason to doubt it. If it was a single piece of evidence, maybe, but we have multiple sources of evidence that can all be cross-referenced, and that are all very solid if you look into it. --[[User:DChiuch\|DChiuch]] ([[User talk:DChiuch\|talk]]) 17:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
	:::::::::Sorry man, but that stuff is just too easy fake. :( A couple of years ago, I trolled the FF community regarding a Type-0 stateside release, with all the bells and whistles. If you want the confirmed existence of something that is dubious, you need at least three individual sources that can be corroborated, preferably in direct contact - ideally, each contact assigned to a different person. To further make it concrete, these contacts should all be consulted by different sites. Fragmented Keys was only covered by you guys, only has a single contact with an extremely suspect portfolio to begin with, and the included "screenshot" contains JPEG artifacts forming a sort of "halo" around the logo - something that can only come from image editing resources. In contrast, an actual game screenshot would utilize image compression with the same pixel ratio as the rest of the individual assets on the image, even IF compressed to a JPEG resolution, like Famitsu does. Like I said man, I pulled this stunt before myself and I can recognize it a mile away. :< But all the same, I'm all for putting up a page - IF we can get enough concrete evidence on it. This is a wiki based on factual information, so for all intents and purposes, we follow the rules of journalistic integrity...right? So, there are certain standards we gotta abide by. --[[User:Webber22\|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22\|talk]]) 20:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)		:::::::::Sorry man, but that stuff is just too easy to fake. :( A couple of years ago, I trolled the FF community regarding a Type-0 stateside release, with all the bells and whistles. If you want the confirmed existence of something that is dubious, you need at least three individual sources that can be corroborated, preferably in direct contact - ideally, each contact assigned to a different person. To further make it concrete, these contacts should all be consulted by different sites. Fragmented Keys was only covered by you guys, only has a single contact with an extremely suspect portfolio to begin with, and the included "screenshot" contains JPEG artifacts forming a sort of "halo" around the logo - something that can only come from image editing resources. In contrast, an actual game screenshot would utilize image compression with the same pixel ratio as the rest of the individual assets on the image, even IF compressed to a JPEG resolution, like Famitsu does. Like I said man, I pulled this stunt before myself and I can recognize it a mile away. :< But all the same, I'm all for putting up a page - IF we can get enough concrete evidence on it. This is a wiki based on factual information, so for all intents and purposes, we follow the rules of journalistic integrity...right? So, there are certain standards we gotta abide by. --[[User:Webber22\|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22\|talk]]) 20:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)