3,310
edits
Forum:Profanity filter: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
Everyone must treat everyone else with love. This is not compromise. It's just charity. Compromise would involve silencing yourself when you have something to mention.}} | Everyone must treat everyone else with love. This is not compromise. It's just charity. Compromise would involve silencing yourself when you have something to mention.}} | ||
{{OKH|time=03:47, July 19, 2010 (UTC)|sad=I'm sorry. I didn't know...;__;I was wrong...;__;}} | {{OKH|time=03:47, July 19, 2010 (UTC)|sad=I'm sorry. I didn't know...;__;I was wrong...;__;}} | ||
{{LA|Vtext | {{LA|Vtext=Oh no! TNE, please don't get mad... | ||
I agree with you both, really. Compromise is a good way to deal with this, but I think it is agreeable to respect user's preferences on this. And '''we are in no way breaking down the channel for this.''' That is the "easy way out", and will NOT be taken at this time. YOu guys! Thisisn't supposed to be a problem, the intention is a debate to choose what deserves to be warned or not! Can we just stop overreacting to everything that's going on and actually start '''resolving the issue'''? Let's '''NOT''' drop this, because it needs to be discussed! We can come to a comprimise, I know it! | I agree with you both, really. Compromise is a good way to deal with this, but I think it is agreeable to respect user's preferences on this. And '''we are in no way breaking down the channel for this.''' That is the "easy way out", and will NOT be taken at this time. YOu guys! Thisisn't supposed to be a problem, the intention is a debate to choose what deserves to be warned or not! Can we just stop overreacting to everything that's going on and actually start '''resolving the issue'''? Let's '''NOT''' drop this, because it needs to be discussed! We can come to a comprimise, I know it! | ||