automoderated
15,833
edits
Forum:Petition: More Ops on IRC: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 223: | Line 223: | ||
I can't say Rocker much though... I'm not trying to be offensive, but... Yeah.}} | I can't say Rocker much though... I'm not trying to be offensive, but... Yeah.}} | ||
{{firaga44|happy=Sounds better then our current thing and don't even think of adding my name to that list i'm serious.}} | {{firaga44|happy=Sounds better then our current thing and don't even think of adding my name to that list i'm serious.}} | ||
{{EO|time=00:24, October 16, 2009 (UTC)|talktext=Yes, SSC's idea is the way to go. I'm flattered that you all find me so "mature and responsible." Let's just hope the admins/mods see the same things. Let's set up a poll for the "lesser" IRC users to use to determine new Op's, so the admins have an outside opinion, shall we? By "lesser", I don't mean "not as good as." I mean it in the sense that we aren't Op's yet. Plus, a poll is much neater than the list MN had us put above.}} | |||
<poll> | |||
'''Who should be Op'd on the IRC, so the Channel is better protected?''' | |||
'''EternalNothingnessXIII''' | |||
'''Super Sword-Chucks''' | |||
'''Xion4ever''' | |||
'''Rocker7898''' | |||
'''MelodiousNature''' | |||
</poll> | |||
{{EO|time=00:24, October 16, 2009 (UTC)|talktext=The above are who I'd find best suited for the job. I'd say we take the top 3 as Op's for now. Should we set a date for the poll to expire? I'd say the start of next year or late November/early December.}} | |||