53,710
edits
Forum:Our Credibility (Or Lack Thereof): Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
{{17m|text= That might be true, but, do we really know how much people visited our Wiki? Who knows, maybe the number of visitors might decrease. Or, we might even barely have any visitors at all. I mean, finding anons or new users in the Recent Changes can be pretty here :/ Of course, not that I'm implying anything here, but it's just... y'know... It worries me a bit. }} | {{17m|text= That might be true, but, do we really know how much people visited our Wiki? Who knows, maybe the number of visitors might decrease. Or, we might even barely have any visitors at all. I mean, finding anons or new users in the Recent Changes can be pretty here :/ Of course, not that I'm implying anything here, but it's just... y'know... It worries me a bit. }} | ||
{{KrytenKoro|emotion=tired|The enemy gallery headers are certainly a more visible form of categorization, but categorization they still are. Though, with the existing way we cover them, including "Crank Tower", "The Experiment", and "Hostile Program"...I think we have an easy out. | |||
Name those sections "Other". Honestly, we have not confirmed whether all of them (specifically those stated above) are truly entelechies, and "Other" is both non-committal, and a neat pun on one of the term's used for a non-Nobody. | |||
And if that's not acceptable, I present my previous proposal: [[wikipedia:Entelechy|Entelechy]]. It literally means this exact type of being, in plain English, and it sounds f'ing awesome. | |||
I maintain, though, that simply retitling them "Characters" or "Other characters" was a lazy, unworkable suggestion only made to ridicule us.}} | |||