7,364
edits
Forum:New game icons: Difference between revisions
m
Old forum, moving to Realm of Sleep
No edit summary |
m (Old forum, moving to Realm of Sleep) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}} | {{Forumheader|The Realm of Sleep|The World that Never was}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
{{Bluer|10:37, October 19, 2009 (UTC)|Not sure what your reasoning is, kupo, why would a "staffmember" template be incorporated when they're just used in the user namespace? The reason why I suggest the "FA icon" template should be incorporated into the "Gameicon" template is because both of these templates are used quite extensively in an article namespace, kupo. | {{Bluer|10:37, October 19, 2009 (UTC)|Not sure what your reasoning is, kupo, why would a "staffmember" template be incorporated when they're just used in the user namespace? The reason why I suggest the "FA icon" template should be incorporated into the "Gameicon" template is because both of these templates are used quite extensively in an article namespace, kupo. | ||
Additionally, I think the | Additionally, I think the "Real" template be reduced to an "icon" as well, kupo. There will be less scrolling, especially since those "notice templates" wasn't suppose to stay on a page for very long, kupo. It's exactly why "spoiler" templates are just reduced to a single line of text, kupo. | ||
http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff25/bluerfn/insectr.jpg | http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff25/bluerfn/insectr.jpg | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
Again, all of this is moot if this format is what the readers want. If they understand it and it works for them, that's dandy.}} | Again, all of this is moot if this format is what the readers want. If they understand it and it works for them, that's dandy.}} | ||
{{GS|time=17:49, October 22, 2009 (UTC)|text=These icons really don't seem that difficult to understand in my opinion. Using the original icons is terrible, because it makes the icons stretch more than necessary. Lots of wikis with icons use custom icons too, and that seems to work fine. I mean, if you hover over the logos, they're going to show the title name anyways.}} | {{GS|time=17:49, October 22, 2009 (UTC)|text=These icons really don't seem that difficult to understand in my opinion. Using the original icons is terrible, because it makes the icons stretch more than necessary. Lots of wikis with icons use custom icons too, and that seems to work fine. I mean, if you hover over the logos, they're going to show the title name anyways.}} | ||
{{Bluer|15:01, October 29, 2009 (UTC)|I will go ahead and do the changes as necessary,}} | |||