Forum:More rights for regular contributors: Difference between revisions

Forum:More rights for regular contributors (edit)

Revision as of 05:06, 29 November 2015

1,444 bytes added , 8 years ago

no edit summary

NinjaSheik

25,122

edits

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 {{TheFifteenthMember|time={{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 16:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)|default=I'd just like to say that I'd be uncomfortable with giving rights to anyone who has received a warning for sockpuppeting, spamming or vandalism.}}
+{{NinjaSheik|text=I'm pretty busy with doing papers since it's nearing the end of the fall semester, but here are my two cents of the matter: I'm supportive of the idea of TheSilentHero, TheFifteenthMember and Chainoffire being promoted, but to admins? I don't think that's necessary. We already have quite a few admins already, as Webber22 pointed out. So, how about promoting them to mods instead? Currently, the users with mods right are Chitalian8, LevL, Troisnyxetienne, and UnknownChaser. However, everyone here knows LevL has not contributed to the wiki in a VERY long time. LevL's last mainspace edit was back in Feb. 2015 and UnknownChaser hasn't been active since the beginning of the month. Pushing UknownChaser aside, LevL hasn't contributed to the wiki in over 6 months. Chitalian8 and TNX are active again, leaving two active mods altogether.
+It's not like we get a lot of vandalism in the first place, there are some articles labeled for moving but hasn't been discussed yet, rarely any edit wars, and if anyone wants anything deleted, we have the Pages of Deletion of that very purposes. Sure, the admins may not get to it right away, but it's not like we're going to forget about it as long as the articles are labeled properly and are notified on the Deletion page. That's why I think it's unnecessary to promote to admins, but I'm not oppose to it, either. They're good and helpful users, who done a lot of the wiki. :)}}