Forum:Monobook being kept?: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
It would still be Oasis for users that aren't logged into an account, right? --[[User:Neumannz|'''<span style="font-family:Gisha; color:#005400">Neumannz</span>''']], [[User talk:Neumannz|''<span style="color:black; font-family:Agency FB Bold">The Dark Falcon</span>'']] 22:13, October 26, 2010 (UTC) | It would still be Oasis for users that aren't logged into an account, right? --[[User:Neumannz|'''<span style="font-family:Gisha; color:#005400">Neumannz</span>''']], [[User talk:Neumannz|''<span style="color:black; font-family:Agency FB Bold">The Dark Falcon</span>'']] 22:13, October 26, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Right. Plus, monobook is missing a lot of the features that we have relied on, like the table of contents. This is a Pyrrhic victory, if anything.[[User:KrytenKoro|(ಠ_ೃ)]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>Bully!</small>]] 22:23, October 26, 2010 (UTC) | :Right. Plus, monobook is missing a lot of the features that we have relied on, like the table of contents. This is a Pyrrhic victory, if anything.[[User:KrytenKoro|(ಠ_ೃ)]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>Bully!</small>]] 22:23, October 26, 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{SannseTalk|time=01:04, October 27, 2010 (UTC)|text=Monobook will stay as a personal option. Sorry if I wasn't clear, Monobook is an old skin without the full set of features so we don't need to put the same time and effort in to keeping it that we would with Monaco. It's also needed for the Wikipedia parody wikis like Uncyclopedia. I know that most people are concerned with Monaco, so that's the one I've been talking about in past messages }} | |||