|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eternal Nothingness XIII - I'm not afraid of what the darkness holds now. Even if you do wrest control of my heart from me, even if you cast me into the deepest, darkest abyss, you'll never sway me from the one cause that pushes me to keep on fighting. Whatever the cost, I'm ready to pay it. TALK - There's darkness within me... So what does that matter? I know I'm strong enough to hold it back. — 10:36, 21 July 2011 (EDT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The full name of the mission is Mission 93: Believe. That should be the article title in my opinion. Since the game uses both methods to refer to mission names (simply the latter and Mission ##), I see no reason as to why there is a problem with the linking method. People, unless they are lazy, write which method fits best in a sentence. Otherwise they use what's easiest to write.
I personally find saying "In the aftermath of [[Mission 92: Xion]], Roxas returns to the World That Never Was in an attempt to reclaim Kingdom Hearts and revitalize Xion in [[Mission 93: Believe]]." sounds worse than saying "In the aftermath of [[Mission 92: Xion|Mission 92]], Roxas returns to the World That Never Was to reclaim Kingdom Hearts and revitalize Xion in [[Mission 93: Believe|Mission 93]]."
With that approach, I'd say title the mission article by its full name, but otherwise link to "Mission ##." But there are instances when the full name should be used in a sentence, such as the opening sentences of articles, where we clearly state the Mission's full name.
In the end, though, since the game supposedly uses both (I cannot remember too well, myself), naming methods are correct and I see no reason why we have to limit ourselves to just one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|