3,310
edits
Forum:Design vs. Appearance: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
{{LightRoxas|axel=True, it doesn't mean they do it better, but majority generally rules. Most wikis I've seen talk about characters having appearance, not design, so it seems more proper. Also, I can't remember ever seeing a etymology section.}} | {{LightRoxas|axel=True, it doesn't mean they do it better, but majority generally rules. Most wikis I've seen talk about characters having appearance, not design, so it seems more proper. Also, I can't remember ever seeing a etymology section.}} | ||
{{KrytenKoro|Etymology sections were only active for a short while before they were all combined with the Design section, and then we started a project that included making etymology coverage, within the Design section, for pretty much all enemies and items.}} | {{KrytenKoro|Etymology sections were only active for a short while before they were all combined with the Design section, and then we started a project that included making etymology coverage, within the Design section, for pretty much all enemies and items.}} | ||
:@LightRoxas: I personally would prefer it if this wiki were in the minority. Who wants to see the same page format over every wiki they visit? We're more interesting if we're different. | |||
:@Inexistent: ''Um, Inexistent'', I don't understand what you don't understand. I am referring to the etymologies, the meaning of a subject's name, that exist within the Design sections around the wiki. | |||
:But I digress; if, say, you get your way and every single enemy article gets their Design section changed to an Appearance section, what do you propose is done to the etymology coverage within those sections? Certainly, "Appearance" doesn't cover meaning of names and anything besides appearance that may exist within the Design section. Rather than argue, propose a counter-solution that is better than what we're doing currently, which is a simple coverage on ''all'' of the aspects of the being in question rather than just what it looks like. --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 21:21, 27 May 2011 (EDT) | |||