Forum:Archiving policy

Forums: Index > The Realm of Sleep > Archiving policy

Sove ^Talk!— "Pitiful Heartless, mindlessly collecting hearts. And yet, they know not the power they hold. The rage of the keyblade releases those hearts. They gather in darkness, masterless and free. Until they weave together to make Kingdom Hearts. And when that time comes, we can truly, finally exist."

_{"True, we don't have hearts, but we remember what it was like. That's what makes us special." — 19:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)}

User talk:Soraxroxas

This is getting ridiculous. He is now going to archive messages the second he reads them and we don't have any rule against doing that. I propose that only messages older than x amount of time may be archived. Archives already make it harder when you want to search something from someone's talk page, so archiving should have limits.

I also propose that warnings may only be archived after one year has passed since the most recent warning, after which they can be archived and considered expired. Not only this allows a user who rarely gets warnings to have the warnings eventually expired, it also makes tracking warnings much less bothersome, when we don't need to check the user's archives for any previous warnings.

And let the discussion begin!

6 months minimum. That's my policy on my own archive. Ay, dios mio! I might be late tomorrow. - Erry 19:57, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Uxie Lover1994 Tiempo de morder de nuevo con el poder! El tema de hoy: su sorpresa! ^{— 20:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)}

I archive my messages after at least two weeks, though some have lasted about a month. I recomend at least a month.

Shard of Truth Once you believe, truth and lie are quite the same thing. ^{— 20:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)}

I archive after the page passed the hundredth message, navigation becomes unbearable after this point. This being said this is not the first case of instantly message archieving but I think these cases will be rare and are not worth our time.

KrytenKoro - This is the song that runs under the credits; these are the credits, so this is where it goes. 'has nothing to do with the movie so we'll say, "Hey! Hey! Hey hey hey hey hey hey!"
TALK -

I'm not sure this needs to be an issue. Whether or not she pretends that they don't exist, the warnings are still active. If we need to make a rule that warnings cannot be archived, only expunged, we can, but it might be simpler to just keep an archive on the heartless manufactory so that we don't have to be constantly watching user talk pages in order to keep track of who is being a little shit.