Forum:@&%&*@%&$@&*$%: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 329: Line 329:
{{17m|text= Just because you have the power, doesn't mean you won't listen to what people said. You're trying to make improvements for the wikias right? But here is what happened: '''It Failed'''. It's clear that a lot of people don't like the new skin, and yet you're forcing us to use the skin. What are you trying to proof really? That the new skin will be better than the older ones? If that's what you're thinking then you need to look at it from our perspective. Sure it looks nicer with the gloss and stuff, but it's not efficient. We're trying to give informations here, not showing off with good looks and stuff. If you can make the wikia look good AND efficient, then that's fine, we'll happily use that skin, but as I mentioned before, the new skin caused too much problem, it's not efficient, people won't be reading our articles because it's so messy. Think about that, will you? I know the staffs put a lot of hard work into this, but this is not working out. I know we never give you anything in return for the services you provide us, but what's the use of making changes and improvements if the majority of us won't like it or even use it?}}
{{17m|text= Just because you have the power, doesn't mean you won't listen to what people said. You're trying to make improvements for the wikias right? But here is what happened: '''It Failed'''. It's clear that a lot of people don't like the new skin, and yet you're forcing us to use the skin. What are you trying to proof really? That the new skin will be better than the older ones? If that's what you're thinking then you need to look at it from our perspective. Sure it looks nicer with the gloss and stuff, but it's not efficient. We're trying to give informations here, not showing off with good looks and stuff. If you can make the wikia look good AND efficient, then that's fine, we'll happily use that skin, but as I mentioned before, the new skin caused too much problem, it's not efficient, people won't be reading our articles because it's so messy. Think about that, will you? I know the staffs put a lot of hard work into this, but this is not working out. I know we never give you anything in return for the services you provide us, but what's the use of making changes and improvements if the majority of us won't like it or even use it?}}
i like the new skin[[Special:Contributions/76.108.34.28|76.108.34.28]] 16:44, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
i like the new skin[[Special:Contributions/76.108.34.28|76.108.34.28]] 16:44, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
{{OavatosDK|time=16:57, October 24, 2010 (UTC)|text=At the very least why can't wikia let all wikis set Monobook as the default? Why should Unencyclopedia get special treatment?
(Posting here because Sannse hasn't commented at all on the FFWiki.)}}
45

edits