361
edits
Forum:"Unobtainables" infoboxes: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
#Something else entirely? | #Something else entirely? | ||
:::::I can definitely see value in uniformity of aesthetic, it's just that I can also see functional obstacles that would definitely need to be resolved before we commit to this.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 17:20, 3 June 2015 (UTC) | :::::I can definitely see value in uniformity of aesthetic, it's just that I can also see functional obstacles that would definitely need to be resolved before we commit to this.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 17:20, 3 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
I never thought you were attacking me lol. Though, I will admit - I was avoiding your initial question since I had no idea what the hell you were saying. So, thanks for expanding on it. Anyway, I will admit, the primary reason for this is the aesthetic - I just feel we need consistency for these pages. But how to handle some of them are fair questions. For starters...I had always assumed Eraqus's key blade and "Aqua's" were one in the same, not two completely different weapons. As for the Void Gear, that one I do feel we should separate. Was Vanitas's red keyblade ever specifically referred to as Void Gear? To my knowledge, only the monochrome version was ever named. Regardless, the coloration alone should set them apart as different beasts. As to why these infoboxes are colored differently from other keychain boxes? I would think the fact that these can't be obtained through means other than modding would qualify. These are unobtainable weapons - for now. Once they are obtainable, by all means, slap them into a regular keychain template. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 03:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC) | |||