361
edits
Forum:Should there be a page for Fragmented Keys?: Difference between revisions
Forum:Should there be a page for Fragmented Keys? (edit)
Revision as of 15:58, 5 May 2016
, 8 years agono edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
::::::Again, I'm not entirely sure it's a good idea. Especially the fact that we ''know'' it's rubbish, yet we still let it hang around just because it follows our guidelines. I mean...exception like that are the very reason our current world is as fucked up as it is. Things that follow rules shouldn't have to be flexible in order to fall within them, it's the ''rules'' that are supposed to be flexible enough to begin with. That goes both ways. Let's see what the others think. To summarize, my stance is that we '''should''' have a page(s) on cancelled projects, provided we have sufficient sources, but '''not''' on rumors. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 00:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC) | ::::::Again, I'm not entirely sure it's a good idea. Especially the fact that we ''know'' it's rubbish, yet we still let it hang around just because it follows our guidelines. I mean...exception like that are the very reason our current world is as fucked up as it is. Things that follow rules shouldn't have to be flexible in order to fall within them, it's the ''rules'' that are supposed to be flexible enough to begin with. That goes both ways. Let's see what the others think. To summarize, my stance is that we '''should''' have a page(s) on cancelled projects, provided we have sufficient sources, but '''not''' on rumors. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 00:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::::::[http://www.ssbwiki.com/List_of_rumors Like SmashWiki,] I think we should only allow rumors that are believed to be true by a large part of the community, like Fragmented Keys and 2.9 were. We can avoid users adding random rumors by protecting the page, so they would have to bring it up on the talk page first. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 13:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC) | ::::::::[http://www.ssbwiki.com/List_of_rumors Like SmashWiki,] I think we should only allow rumors that are believed to be true by a large part of the community, like Fragmented Keys and 2.9 were. We can avoid users adding random rumors by protecting the page, so they would have to bring it up on the talk page first. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 13:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::But what ''part'' of the community? We're kind of divided, sad to say. Most of the folks on KH13 would believe anything they read. The people on KHInsider can be more skeptical than even us. And Gamefaqs and Neogaf....let's not even go there. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 15:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC) | |||