3,310
edits
Forum:Design vs. Appearance: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
I don't see what counter- solution I can really propose, other than this. {{The Inexistentsig}} 21:46, 27 May 2011 (EDT) | I don't see what counter- solution I can really propose, other than this. {{The Inexistentsig}} 21:46, 27 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
:Counter-counter-solution: Get rid of "Appearance" entirely. It's a flimsy, wishy-washy term that is oh-so-limited. Each thing within KH, even the characters, has a healthy history of design decisions and background, from the clothes they wear to the name they have. ''Especially'' Sora, Riku, and Kairi. Using "Design" also allows for discussion of the ''process'' of creating the character, such as GrieverSora— - separating out everything but the looks means we must have "Etymology" and "Development" sections.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 00:13, 28 May 2011 (EDT) | :Counter-counter-solution: Get rid of "Appearance" entirely. It's a flimsy, wishy-washy term that is oh-so-limited. Each thing within KH, even the characters, has a healthy history of design decisions and background, from the clothes they wear to the name they have. ''Especially'' Sora, Riku, and Kairi. Using "Design" also allows for discussion of the ''process'' of creating the character, such as GrieverSora— - separating out everything but the looks means we must have "Etymology" and "Development" sections.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 00:13, 28 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
::Oooh, I like that. --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 01:02, 28 May 2011 (EDT) | |||