Forum:Etymology and Appearances: Difference between revisions

Forum:Etymology and Appearances (edit)

108 bytes added , 14 years ago

no edit summary

23,123

edits

Revision as of 10:08, 30 October 2009 (edit) KrytenKoro (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:35, 30 October 2009 (edit) (undo) Troisnyxetienne (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 18:		Line 18:

	If we ''do'' decide to do it, I think the appearance section should specifically be based around explaining the origin of the design - with the Gargoyle, it should be "In European mythology, [[wikipedia:Gargoyle\|Gargoyle]]s are an x", and explaining stuff like that. I don't think we need a ''full'' rundown , like "They have the yellow shiny eyes", etc., just what makes them unique. However, it's definitely important to note where their emblem is.}}		If we ''do'' decide to do it, I think the appearance section should specifically be based around explaining the origin of the design - with the Gargoyle, it should be "In European mythology, [[wikipedia:Gargoyle\|Gargoyle]]s are an x", and explaining stuff like that. I don't think we need a ''full'' rundown , like "They have the yellow shiny eyes", etc., just what makes them unique. However, it's definitely important to note where their emblem is.}}
			{{TNE\|time=11:35, October 30, 2009 (UTC)\|happytext=Good thinking. Shall we all go with this ? I say yes !}}