Forum:Birth By Sleep spoiler policy: Difference between revisions

Forum:Birth By Sleep spoiler policy (edit)

Revision as of 04:30, 12 January 2010

309 bytes added , 14 years ago

no edit summary

KrytenKoro

53,710

edits

@@ Line 75: / Line 75: @@
 It is really ironic that even though there's a page protection in place on his article, I get spoiled about Vanitas from its talk page,}}
-{{KrytenKoro|I started this forum and locked the pages specifically because multiple editors asked me to, and when some new editors have complained about it, I have directed them to this forum and asked them to chime in. I agree with them that there is ample evidence of new editors rushing to post spoilers, and in the process making a mess of the pages, ''especially'' given the fact that, at the time ''there were no translations available''.
+{{KrytenKoro|I'd like to remind bluerfn that this discussion of the spoiler policy has only been up for three days, and most of the major editors haven't even had a chance to comment here. Considering the reliability of the "information" being added despite the protections, the spoiler policy is toothless, if anything.
+I started this forum and locked the pages specifically because multiple editors asked me to, and when some new editors have complained about it, I have directed them to this forum and asked them to chime in. I agree with them that there is ample evidence of new editors rushing to post spoilers, and in the process making a mess of the pages, ''especially'' given the fact that, at the time ''there were no translations available''.
 The point of a wiki is to encourage the building of articles, yes, but '''when it is 100% certain that the information is not verifiable or reliable''', protection is appropriate.