Forum:Should there be a page for Fragmented Keys?: Difference between revisions
Forum:Should there be a page for Fragmented Keys? (edit)
Revision as of 11:17, 9 May 2016
, 8 years agono edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
I agree with Webber on this point. I don't see the value in talking about "rumours", ie. things that could be made up. I think that's too close to cataloging fan-made stuff, which is outside of the scope of this wiki. I think we should consider the evidence on each rumour individually and only write about the ones that are solid. Also on the point of "What website counts as a source? Does a KH fansite? Does IGN?", I think again we should ignore the reputation of the reporting website and instead look at the specific evidence, and just consider the legitimacy of the actual source of the evidence. --[[User:DChiuch|DChiuch]] ([[User talk:DChiuch|talk]]) 04:06, 6 May 2016 (UTC) | I agree with Webber on this point. I don't see the value in talking about "rumours", ie. things that could be made up. I think that's too close to cataloging fan-made stuff, which is outside of the scope of this wiki. I think we should consider the evidence on each rumour individually and only write about the ones that are solid. Also on the point of "What website counts as a source? Does a KH fansite? Does IGN?", I think again we should ignore the reputation of the reporting website and instead look at the specific evidence, and just consider the legitimacy of the actual source of the evidence. --[[User:DChiuch|DChiuch]] ([[User talk:DChiuch|talk]]) 04:06, 6 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
:But....the whole point - practically the ''definition'' - to rumors is that they ''aren't'' solid. The....uhm, solidity, is what separates rumors from facts. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 19:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC) | :But....the whole point - practically the ''definition'' - to rumors is that they ''aren't'' solid. The....uhm, solidity, is what separates rumors from facts. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 19:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
Pardon for extending an already extended conversation, but I found the background artist's website, which I'm not sure has been brought up before. Owen Rohu is an Irish matte painter who's worked at Disney, and currently freelances. | |||
http://www.owenrohu.com/digital-paintings.html | |||
This page from his website features the WIR, L&S, Agrabah, Neverland, Grid and SW backgrounds, all labelled as "Disney Gaming Environment", slightly mixed with his Angry Birds backgrounds. | |||
The kicker is that I found it through googling Traverse Town images. There was actually a Traverse Town background, of the same flattened style (though seemingly incomplete), up on the website that for whatever reason has since been removed. The preview should still be brought up in Google if you search "owenrohu traverse town", though the original image can't be recovered. On top of that, http://www.filmmayo.ie/directory/owen-rohu lists him as working on "Kingdom Hearts", which would support the Traverse Town image's existence. | |||
I'm pondering if this has any value whatsoever towards proving or disproving the rumour, since he does have some legitimate Disney credits. | |||
[[Special:Contributions/195.171.114.174|195.171.114.174]] 11:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC) | |||