361
edits
Forum:"Unobtainables" infoboxes: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::::Like I said, look at the Olympus Stone. The "stats" tabs are just blanks. No stats, yet it's till there. I mean, you COULD go with that albeit use the black and gray color scheme - I just figured there would be no need for them, so I kept it simple. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 21:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC) | ::::Like I said, look at the Olympus Stone. The "stats" tabs are just blanks. No stats, yet it's till there. I mean, you COULD go with that albeit use the black and gray color scheme - I just figured there would be no need for them, so I kept it simple. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 21:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::The Olympus Stone infobox has the item's in-game description. The infobox for that should probably be rejiggered so that the unused cells don't display, but there ''is'' at least some in-game data to attach to the item. For Xehanort's Keyblade, or Eraqus's version of Master's Defender, we don't have that. What I'm asking is, beyond adding infoboxes to articles that don't already have them, how do you propose to extend the use consistently to handle stuff like Master's Defender?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 23:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC) | :::The Olympus Stone infobox has the item's in-game description. The infobox for that should probably be rejiggered so that the unused cells don't display, but there ''is'' at least some in-game data to attach to the item. For Xehanort's Keyblade, or Eraqus's version of Master's Defender, we don't have that. What I'm asking is, beyond adding infoboxes to articles that don't already have them, how do you propose to extend the use consistently to handle stuff like Master's Defender?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 23:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::Well, it's a bit of a longshot....what about Ultimania descriptions? They're about as legit and official as anything else. That said, do we ''have'' to put in anything else? What's wrong with just keep them for the katakana and romanization? The whole point of info boxes is to keep what we do know neatly collected, and that's what we '''do''' know. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 14:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC) | ::::Well, it's a bit of a longshot....what about Ultimania descriptions? They're about as legit and official as anything else. That said, do we ''have'' to put in anything else? What's wrong with just keep them for the katakana and romanization? The whole point of info boxes is to keep what we do know neatly collected, and that's what we '''do''' know. It makes the info box smaller, and....so what lol? They don't ''have'' to have a whole bunch of stats and whatnot. And when they ''do'' get their stats, we just fixer the boxes up so that they display. The beauty of wikis, right? The only reason why I proposed this was so that these few pages don't stick out as the ugly cousins. --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 14:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC) | ||