23,123
edits
Forum:ErryK as an OP: Difference between revisions
→Discussion
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
The only thing that is "more to this" as in evidence is the past times I've been rude. But that was not done on purpose. {{User:Erry/Sig}} 20:58, 28 August 2011 (UTC) | The only thing that is "more to this" as in evidence is the past times I've been rude. But that was not done on purpose. {{User:Erry/Sig}} 20:58, 28 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
{{TNE|time=18:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)|angrytext=Okay, let me get this straight. | |||
#Discussion was not taken off-channel. | |||
#Deops were countered with ops, causing massive spam with ChanServ. | |||
#Erry gets kicked. | |||
#Second time, someone else spams and Erry gets kicked. | |||
#Next day, he is deopped completely. | |||
I vehemently disagree with ALL that had happened. Dispute resolution literally has to take place because both parties are at fault: one for spamming, one for whose actions needed consideration... and weren't given much of it. Without being funny, both of you — DTN and Erry — have made mistakes in the past on the IRC. And so have I. But in no way did that mean shirking anyone of our responsibilities until this point. An op is a human, and insofar as he has admitted his faults and has wished to remedy the situation, his op status should be kept. We have deopped people who repeatedly broke the rules on the IRC and considered it nothing more than a mere joke. This was obviously not the case here, and I call for remedial action on both sides.}} | |||