3
edits
Talk:Dark Riku: Difference between revisions
→Not Riku Replica
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
The San Fransokyo and Keyblade Graveyard story sections of the journal refer to Dark Riku as being a replica (rather than a time-traveling Riku), and also as being a separate entity from Riku Replica (in that it calls Riku Replica a "third Riku" entering the fray). --[[User:Vanitas|Vanitas]] ([[User talk:Vanitas|talk]]) 23:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC) | The San Fransokyo and Keyblade Graveyard story sections of the journal refer to Dark Riku as being a replica (rather than a time-traveling Riku), and also as being a separate entity from Riku Replica (in that it calls Riku Replica a "third Riku" entering the fray). --[[User:Vanitas|Vanitas]] ([[User talk:Vanitas|talk]]) 23:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
:I mean, it would be, it's a third body. It can still be a Master Xehanort/Young Xehanort situation. Hell, they already have Ansem, and he's technically using Riku's body.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 00:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC) | :I mean, it would be, it's a third body. It can still be a Master Xehanort/Young Xehanort situation. Hell, they already have Ansem, and he's technically using Riku's body.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 00:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
I feel that the game goes pretty far out of its way to clarify that Dark Riku is not the same as the original Riku Replica. Despite the dialogue from San Fransokyo onwards attempting to mislead the player into thinking that this Riku is a time-traveller from his time possessed as Ansem, an interval actually explicitly states otherwise. Specifically, "Interval VI-2: The Keyblade Graveyard", in which Marluxia states: "Vexen's latest replicas are no mere puppets. The Riku replica we used in Castle Oblivion was just a prototype. The next replica, the one crafted from Sora's memories, was real enough to join our ranks." - [[User:Truthful-Sentiment|Truthful-Sentiment]] ([[User talk:Truthful-Sentiment|talk]]) 04:47, 26 February 2019 (UTC) | |||