Forum:Nobody naming ceremony: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Oh, that rule doesn't apply to all nobodies. It only applies to those in the Organization. Xemnas(or Xigbar or Xaldin) would never recruit anyone with X already in their name. I mean, if they found a nobody that can like manipulate worlds in an instant, but had an X in their name, they wouldn't let him in cause Xemnas/Xigbar/Xaldin would be too busy/lazy/uncaring to make up a new rule for people with an X in their names. [[User:XienZo|XienZo]] 01:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC) | :Oh, that rule doesn't apply to all nobodies. It only applies to those in the Organization. Xemnas(or Xigbar or Xaldin) would never recruit anyone with X already in their name. I mean, if they found a nobody that can like manipulate worlds in an instant, but had an X in their name, they wouldn't let him in cause Xemnas/Xigbar/Xaldin would be too busy/lazy/uncaring to make up a new rule for people with an X in their names. [[User:XienZo|XienZo]] 01:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
What would your name be then? Zexixon? Talking to Xienzo. - [[SleepingDragon7|SleepingDragon7]] | What would your name be then? Zexixon? Talking to Xienzo. - [[User:SleepingDragon7|SleepingDragon7]] | ||
He makes perfect sense. For instance, in the case of Axel, the only logical name that i can think of is alex. Other choices could be: Ale, Ael, Ela, Eal, Lea, or Lae but unless one of those are Japanese, Alex sounds right. SO if there is an 'X' already in someone's name i guess they would just move it around [[User:Ryn|Ryn]] | He makes perfect sense. For instance, in the case of Axel, the only logical name that i can think of is alex. Other choices could be: Ale, Ael, Ela, Eal, Lea, or Lae but unless one of those are Japanese, Alex sounds right. SO if there is an 'X' already in someone's name i guess they would just move it around [[User:Ryn|Ryn]] | ||