Talk:Level Up


 * That's perfectly fine. We do need the basic article names as redirects, though I suppose this page would work best to cover all the info.

This page should have

1) A list of the maximum numbers of each panel, when multiples are available (i.e., there's 39 Level Up panels) 2) How to get each panel - through redeeming, treasure chests, purchase, or how many you can get from leveling up. 3) Pictures. 4) It might also be a good idea to have a screenshot of the optimum organization of all level-up panels - I have it on mine, so once the panel sprites are uploaded, I can assemble the image. Glorious  CHAOS!  03:55, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

Level Up (Chip)
From Re:coded, it redirects here, shouldn't we make a separate article? And while we're at it, maybe we should make an article about Level Up as a term, so it would be something like Level Up (Chip), Level Up (Panel) and Level Up.
 * Or we can just make a Level Up article that explains the term with different games's method of leveling up. 20:49, 26 March 2011 (EDT)

Why would we make a new page? They have the same name and function. And "Level" already talks about the mechanics of leveling up. -- 20:53, 26 March 2011 (EDT)

Yeah, but they're not exactly the same, like the Days one is a panel, while the Re:coded one is a chip. Besides, the way to double their effect is different and where they're installed is also different. Or maybe at least we explain Re:coded's Level Up chip in this article. But honestly, I think Re:coded's level up chip deserves an article for itself. 21:04, 26 March 2011 (EDT)


 * Like I said in my edit summary, we're not separating Glide (ability) and Glide (panel), or Fire (command) and Fire (panel). We don't separate every slightly different incarnation of everything. The only reason we separate the Haste from Re:coded is because it's Japanese name is different, making it technically a different ability. We should certainly explain the workings of the Level Up chip here, although that's partly already covered on Stat Matrix. -- 21:21, 26 March 2011 (EDT)

Like Neumannz is saying, tags are bad. We don't want them. It's best to keep it all in one page, especially when the appearances aren't really that different. -- 22:09, 26 March 2011 (EDT)