Forum:Dream Eater attack pages


 * Commands, probably. And separate pages, with youmay or disambig links. 06:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Are they actually called commands? What are they called in the pause menu or in the Ultimania? 17:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The Ultimania calls them 技, which translates to technique, art, or skill (according to Jisho). I don't think they are called anything in-game. However, most of the magic attacks are also commands for Sora and Riku.
 * Another question: should the required dispositions be listed in the Learning section or the Mechanics section, or somewhere else?
 * For the page about the combo attacks, should the lead just say which attacks make up the combo and link to them, or should it just describe what the attack does, and link to the individual attacks in a See also section?  18:08, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * They don't really need to be "called" commands - the type of thing they are is a command, small c. If they are given an official name, we can change that.
 * Dispositions should be in Mechanics -- learning is only for obtaining the ability in the first place, not in activating it.
 * If the combo exists of exactly those pieces, then it should link to them. If it's just a replacement for those pieces, it should have a see also. 20:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Except they're not similar to commands; they're not like the menu commands from core games or deck commands. The word "command" implies an input (from the player) is needed, which isn't true here. It's mostly a nitpicked issue but we should refer to them as attacks, which is the best description of what they are. Also, I think the dispositions should be covered under obtainment. How to find and equip the ability is more relevant to obtainment than the mechanics of the actual attack itself. 21:25, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Find is not the same as equip. If the only thing preventing the use of a skill is the Disposition, which can be changed at will (more or less), then it should be in Mechanics. (Also, if we don't include Disposition in the obtainment of Abilities from the Ability Link, why should we include it here?)
 * I would propose "skill" if you need a word for it. It's a decent catch-all. -- 22:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)