User talk:NinjaSheik

Super Special Announcement
https://twitter.com/shonenjump/status/810010343405682688 Your thoughts on its confirmation? 07:44, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * http://media.tumblr.com/b02969e5c5d399ce7a87f25002766bbc/tumblr_inline_mw38y2md2Y1rbgili.gif --Ignis (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * SuperSajuuk is just as lovable as usual. 19:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I read about the announcement this morning. I even know about the Boruto anime getting launched! :D I'm not all that thrilled about the idea of a live-action Hollywood film for Naruto series, though. Let's face it: Hollywood is going to making it tank. Doing a live-action Hollywood film based off a manga? C'mon, that never works out well. But I am excited about Boruto getting an anime series! :D I was hoping for it. I might have stopped editing on the Narutopedia for my own personal reasons, but I am still very much a big fan of Naruto!
 * I sense sarcasm there... ^__^; I still visit the Narutopedia every day, so I know that jerk haven't changed much since I left. The Narutopedia grammar has fallen down drastically since I left, too. :( I see so many mistakes on the pages now, and whoever does the episodes' summaries doesn't seem to believe in spacing out the paragraphs, either.-- 21:00, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Edge of Tomorrow/Live Die Repeat worked out well. That was a movie based off a manga based off a light novel!  --Ignis (talk) 00:06, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Never watched the film or really heard much about it. Still, that isn't a very good counterargument. ^_^; That film, as you said, was based off a novel. I only said that films based off manga never work well. Hollywood botches up too much when it comes to films based off manga. Never works well. People find a lot to complain about already with that Death Note film that's currently in the making.-- 20:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * No, I never said it was based off a novel. It was based off a manga based off a novel lol.  The movie contains elements that were in the manga but not in the novel - it's closer to the manga than to the book, if you will.  I can pretty much guarantee you that the film botches nothing.  It's a rarity, sure, but at least it gives me hope for the Ghost in the Shell film. --Ignis (talk) 21:09, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I never read the Ghost in the Shell before, so I can't really comment on it. I know there's a lot of complaints about it already. Sci-Fi manga are easier to do, but doing something like a huge and complex as Naruto? That'd be impossible to do properly, with the huge cast of characters, the battle sequences, the jutsus, settings, and the like.-- 22:44, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree. The last thing we want is what happened with Dragonball Evolution. I think I'll wait until I read the reviews for the movie before I decide whether or not I want to watch it. Rex Ronald Rilander (talk) 05:07, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Lol, I would think Brick killing a guy with a trident summed up my reaction to this perfectly. But I'm not one to kill the idea of live action adaptations entirely.  As I've said, they can be done well because they've been done well before.  In fact, Ninja, that's your homework assignment!  Go watch the live-action Rurouni Kenshin movies, and tell me it can't be done!  Ah, but that's not egregious enough!  So I go back to my previous comment - go watch Edge of Tomorrow.  That movie probably has the worst case of Americanization ever - an ordinary Japanese man is turned into a dashing American hero!  Played by Tom Cruise, no less!  Yet, I dare you to tell me you didn't enjoy the hell out of it.  >:P  You won't be able to.  Hell, just look at this!  --Ignis (talk) 07:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * As Cloud typically says, "Not interested." Lol. XD Sorry, but I never was interested in Rurouni Kenshin films, or Edge of Tomorrow. I like Tom Cruise, but the actors/actresses featuring the films aren't a deciding factor to whether I watch something or not. I'm extremely picky about what I watch/read, and I have a strong personal belief not to let reviews and ratings on websites, especially a website like Rotten Tomatoes, to influence what I watch. Even if the reviews are typically good or bad, if the series/shows or whatever doesn't peak my interest, then I don't watch it. Plus, I'm way behind on a lot of stuff because of college, so I have enough things to do/watch/read before the winter break ends. XD-- 20:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Take a leap of faith lol. What's the worst that could happen?  ;)  --Ignis (talk) 23:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I waste my time checking something out that I'm not really interested in? :P Like I said, never been interested in the Rurouni Kenshin series. I never even watched the anime. And like I said before, I'm way behind on other things because of college, and have more pressing things to attend to before next semester. I honestly don't have the time to waste on things I have no interest in. ^__^;-- 20:58, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Discord Channel
I made a discord channel. https://discordapp.com/channels/272088543478677516/272088543478677516 20:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw the forum just now. But you know I don't really go to the IRC all that much to begin with. The KHWiki's on-site IRC is more convenient to use, anyway. I'm not going to create an account there when I can just chat to users on the IRC. Still, thanks for letting me know. :)-- 20:49, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You can use voice and video conversations on Discord channels and would be good for podcasts and looks better then a IRC plus you can fix spelling mistakes with discord so it would be worth making a discord account besides doesn't KHWiki require you to register in the same way. 20:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * But you don't have to register to use IRC lol. --Ignis (talk) 22:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * But Discord is cooler and better and is being used by more and more users. 23:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Honestly, "cool features" never really appeals to me. I don't care what features something has or how popular it is. Efficiency is more important to me. I think the on-site IRC is more convenient since:

A.) You don't even need an account to sign into it.

B.) As it's on-site, you don't have to leave the wiki to go to a different site just to talk to other users.

C.) The Discord Channel allows users to change their text, but I think that's one of the down sides of it. IRC channels are typically disabled from other wikias because how much they are abused by users. Changing text when a conversation gets out of hand can eliminate evidence of a user's wrongdoings. Our IRC doesn't, which preserves all evidence of a user's misbehavior as long as someone screencaps it.

D.) I hardly think anyone is going to be comfortable having a voice and/or video conversations.-- 20:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Well if anyone wants Podcasts and thev Magazine to return Discord is the way. 20:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Well....I personally wouldn't mind the magazine making a comeback. I always rather like it personally, but...other than me, was there really any kind of audience for it?  --Ignis (talk) 22:06, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * There was me. 22:19, 22 January 2017 (UTC)