Talk:Lea

Why did someone make this? Is it really nesscesary?-- Ninja Sheik  17:53, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

That would make sense if Lea either had a conformed appearance. This is the same as giving Sora's mom a page...-- 18:00, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Look very carefully at this article...is there any information in it that does not already appear on Axel's page? I really don't see anything being added to the wiki by this being here. Granted, there are pages being made for other "somebodies", but that is presuming they will have a role and story in Birth By Sleep outside of their existence as Nobodies. Unless more of Lea's background is unveiled somehow, this really should just be a redirect to Axel's article. Bebop Kate  18:27, October 31, 2009 (UTC)


 * What does it matter if someone said "this is like giving Sora's mom a page" before? That's exactly what this is. All we know about Lea is his name and that he was friends with whole!Saix. And that's it. This page is only longer than an introduction because it just talks about Axel, which we have the Axel page for.—Urutapu 19:04, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Cut it out, you guys.-- Ninja Sheik  19:09, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

The founding members are a little more important than Lea, that'd be my guess. I don't remember them having pages until after they were conformed in BBS.-- 19:21, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

True.-- Ninja Sheik  19:23, October 31, 2009 (UTC)


 * While we did have pages for the founding members, they were subject to this exact same debate. Many felt we did not need the pages, as the bulk of the information focused on the Nobody instead of the person.  Now that BbS info has changed things, the pages have suitably changed.  Look at Lea's page...two-thirds of the text are on Axel, not on Lea.  Even the intro says, "Not much is known about him."  Why do we need a second article on what is basically the same person?  Bebop  Kate  20:00, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

GS undefined

Go ahead.-- Ninja Sheik  20:11, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps.-- Ninja Sheik  20:15, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

GS undefined

GS undefined

Vote
GS undefined

GS undefined


 * Because it's absurdly speculative, and if you honestly can't see that, then you shouldn't be editing this kind of article any more. Every bit of what you just said is text-book speculation. Glorious  CHAOS!  20:21, November 10, 2009 (UTC)

GS undefined

Flynn as Lea
Not gonna use my talk bubble as this is kinda official. - http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/4466/leac.jpg - there is the source. Taken straight from my Facebook, I asked him the question as to whether he was doing Lea and he confirmed it.