Talk:Armor of Eraqus

''This page should only be used for discussion related to the article. Any discussions related to simply the game itself should be held in the forums, and will be removed from this page if posted.''

Stats
So is there any source of its stats? HP, Strength, Immunities, all that good stuff. Mar 04:42, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Merging

 * No, we shouldn't. Armor of the Master and No Heart are not the same kind of thing the Lingering Will is, according to that Nomura interview. They are data simulations of Eraqus and Xehanort, just like the Ice Colossus battle is a data simulation of the Ice Colossus, MA Zack to Zack, or the Replica Data in KH2FM are to the Organization. No other article has separate coverage of bosses that are the original vs. a data simulation (barring coded, which is a very special case), and if we separate these, logically we have to separate those, as well as the Unversed articles for all Unversed who appear in the MA. 17:44, February 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * They actually use many of the same techniques, for one, and the difference in attacks is not much different than the difference between the Replica Data and Absent Silhouettes and their originals, which we did merge. On the "appearance" tac, Xemnas has about five different appearances, but they are all covered on one page. 04:51, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hell, we have "Xemnas" and "Xemnas (Armored Controller)" covered on the same page. If that's not precedent, I don't know what is. 04:53, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * IMO, since No Heart and AotM aren't exactly Eraqus and MX, we should let them have their own pages, similar to Lingering Will that's not exactly Terra, yet we don't merge them 05:22, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * The Lingering Will has a completely separate nature. AotM is seriously a data replica of Eraqus. 05:26, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * ....you have a point, Then I agree on moving the page to Eraqus's. But, what about No Heart? Nomura hasn't confirmed yet if it's MX's armor or not, right? Moving it to MX's page would be speculatibg. 05:44, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * But at what point does obviousness exceed speculation? :| -- 20:06, February 6, 2011 (UTC)