Forum:Magazine and Podcast!

Sign-Up
Please sign your name under your desired post along with a quick summary of what you will do for the page. Note: The users in control of these posts will likely alternate after each issue (except perhaps the executive editor and coder). Also, multiple editors may share one post and one user can have multiple posts so don't feel put off when someone else already signed up for a post you wanted. Maybe your ideas can be merged or your idea can be done next time!


 * Executive Editor: Oversees the entire process, available to help users writing the articles if needed, and hosts the mailbag.


 * News Reporters: Writes news for Wikis and KH.
 * Cause I handle the Journal on the wikia, I can also write up the news section for the KH series. 14:50, 17 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Coders: Runs the template and ensures it is working correctly.
 * I can make the main coding and the variables for putting the content. I can also help the other editors formatting the topics as they want. E.G.: changing text and background color, adding margins, borders and things like that


 * Special Editor: Writes the Special Editor Page.


 * Wiki Helpers:' Writes the Dive to the Heart.
 * The several types of links: One [Two] and


 * Interviewers: Writes up the Round Room and perhaps user interviews for the User Page.


 * Reviewer: Writes a review and "Top 5 List" for the User Page.
 * I'd like to just do the Top 5 list (best magic commands in Re:coded).


 * Puzzlers: Makes the Game Grid.


 * Artists: Draws the front cover and a piece of fanart for Namine's Sketchbook.


 * Proof Reader: Double checks all other pieces.
 * If you guys are still looking for someone to do this, I'd be happy to help.

Discussion
See Forum talk:Magazine and Podcast!

Crunch Time
🇲🇽


 * I'll step up to the position of EiC, since we need to get stuff done. But I would like a Co-EiC from KHWiki if possible. If I were to do the mailbag, I'd need the password to the account if someone knows it. 05:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Template Talk
I'm trying out some title banners for the pages. Please take a look at the test page and let me know what you think. :) 10:47, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

"Warning: Template include size is too large. Some templates will not be included." So that explains much of what's missing on the page KeybladeSpyMaster (talk) 05:45, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Chaser: There is already a description sections on the roundroom page, we'll put it there. 05:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * KSM:That means this page needs to be archived.

Sign-Up
Sign your name here if you want to take part!

Discussion

 * 5 people is too much of a cluster to do, even with visuals going on (also, I'm too lazy to edit that much visuals), especially with audio-only podcast. Most podcast are done with 3/4 people so that its easier to hear whats being said. 16:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright, but so far we only have one person able to do the podcast. Anyone else who can do it? 16:33, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Visually speaking (depending on how lazy I'm gonna be when I edit this), and using me, FM, Ek, and Cof as example and that me and Cof are the one that are currently speaking, the podcast visual should look something like this. 17:09, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Would it be possible to have the names besides each wavelength so that the viewer can match name-to-voice easier? 19:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Over the IRC, UC explained to me that doing the visuals would take a lot of work since you'd be listening to the podcast for half an hour, figuring out who's speaking at each second and animating their wavelength. I think we should plan a podcast, record it and see how tedious it is to make the visual. 09:59, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Sounds like a good idea. Another idea is to have the pictures on the side next to the wavelengths so it's a bit clearer. Not sure what'd happen to the logo though. 03:26, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Typing " : " over and over is getting to be a pain ಠ_ಠ Also I did do another layout for the podacast thats more easier to understand. Also, also Cof to answer your question about G+ vs Skype. G+ will record your hangout and make it ready for upload, but you cant edit the video. While with Skype you would have to edit the thing and upload it.  17:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Just gonna stick my nose in here and say that that layout looks great, UC. 15:42, 18 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Another topic: what is the podcast going to be rated? Is this going to be PG-13 or are we going to have to keep it PG? I'm sure minor swear words will slip out, but would we bleep/edit those out in the event that someone does accidentally say something? 06:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Considering this will still be a representation of the Wiki, I think it should use the same rules and standards as appropriate here (except obviously more informal), meaning it won't be like the IRC. About bleeping out words, I'd think that'd only be necessary if it's actually vulgar language. I don't know about you guys but in my eyes, words like "damn" and "hell" aren't exactly "swear words". 22:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I say we make it PG13, thats what most podcast's tend to be around. 16:39, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * That seems fair. We should probably give out a spoiler warning and a PG-13 warning at the beginning of the podcast then. 22:58, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * So do we want to have a day to test this out then? 02:37, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Update: so it look like we won't be able to do fancy audio visualizer, only because my computer can't run the damn thing, because its old. Also, the programs to make the audio wavelength is not compatible with my editing program and I'l too lazy to find the correct version. So my new idea is that we have a basic background with each person icon lighting up whenever someone talks. Also, also, everyone is gonna need to have their own microphone to capture high quality audio for me to edit with. 12:03, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Agenda
5 Minutes wouldn't be enough time to cover some of those topics without the podcast sounding too rushed. The four of us have already come up with our own agenda, we would run the podcast to be 45-60ish minutes. But those are good ideas, I've based some new ones off of the agenda. 04:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, that's cool. 15:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)