Talk:Rainfell

bold connections?

Image
This image is not identical to what is seen in the available BBS scans, as explained in the forums. So, I'm leaving it here, where we can decide if and how we want to recycle it. Glorious  CHAOS!  00:02, October 30, 2009 (UTC)

That was the Keyblade in KHIIFM. I'm sure of it. The one in the Chamber of Repose. The BBS scans are definitely not identical to this one, but yeah.  TNÉ  je t'♥ mélancolie ! 00:08, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * So, that brings up the issue: Is this Aqua's Keyblade? Or Lingering Sentiment 2's Keyblade? Glorious  CHAOS!  01:35, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * That, or it could've been a prototype. Good question...  TNÉ  je t'♥ mélancolie ! 02:45, October 30, 2009 (UTC)

Maybe all three characters can get different forms of Keyblades not necessarily related to worlds? Sora had the Kingdom Key but also Oathkeeper and Oblivion. Although, scans usually didn't show him with them unless he was in a form....

That's definately Aqua's. The Chamber of Repose and the Birth By Sleep secret ending are evidence of that. What to do about the image is the problem here. I don't really see a reason to delete it. Don't like using trivia for this, but we could include the image of the picture to compare the two versions. Similar to the Crumbling Island problem.-- Xion 4  ever  22:15, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

From watching the live-streaming gameplay, this particular keyblade of Aqua's is called the "ラインストーム (Rain Storm)" Aoyoku 10:43, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * We've gotten different claims from other editors, so you're going to need to provide an actual link so that we can check it. Glorious  CHAOS!  16:51, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * ok, I'll see if I can find one, oh shoots! This might be difficult..well, if I can't, will just wait for it. Figure someones bound to do it sooner or later ;P Special:Contributions/Aokyoku 21:53, January 9, 2010 (UTC)

Rain Storm is in 1:09 in this video, Rain Fall is at 3:28. They look VERY similar. but they're definitely different Keyblades, and this article is correct: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoM13taZp1o 72.77.96.235 06:33, February 2, 2010 (UTC)