KHWiki:Pages for deletion

__NEWSECTIONLINK__ This is the page for listing articles, templates, categories, or other pages to discuss deletion. Voice your opinion on the deletion of these items by adding a bulleted comment and signing your name at the end of your comment with ~. Once a discussion has concluded, an administrator will close the discussion. Discussions may be archived a week after being closed.

To add a new heading, click the "+" button at the top of the page or click here. You will be given a box to input a header or topic.
 * To list an article, type article title.
 * To list a category type : Category:Name of category. Remember the colon in the beginning or it won't link correctly.
 * To list a template, type to generate a link to the template.

For archived discussions, see the Archives.

Caterpillar
I don't think that characters or places from V Cast should have their own articles, seeing as V Cast isn't canon to the series and is more like a side thing, such as manga or the KH card game. Everything from V Cast should be kept in that one article. Guardian Soul 07:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Agreed, i had no idea the character exsisted in the KH Universe, which V cast isnt really, but also kind of is just not really cannonical but it has a good image, maybe there isnt a lot of info but theres pages out there with a lot less and there still there. I say we keep it.

Disorganizationxiii
I think Disorganizationxiii needs to be Deletion. its fan stuff. so I'll leave you guys to remove itEliskuya2 17:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

I object. It's really the best out of all parodies out there and clearly deserves it's own wiki. It's not really fan stuff. If it were fan stuff, it would just be somebody saying, "I LOVE ORGANIZATION XIII!" or just put random pics and facts about kingdom hearts on the page. It's an official series taht should be kept here. Please. I worked forever on that page.


 * We don't do fan works here, unless it's on a user page. And even then, we're not big fans of shameless self-promotion. Deleted. BebopKate 02:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

well its up again bebop can we just block things like thatEliskuya2 04:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

they need to make a wiki for all fan things and ect. and I hope this time it gets deletionEliskuya2 04:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

yeah let my friend bebop duel with it. and troisnyxetienne come to my page if you need some hints on KHEliskuya2 16:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

XienZo got it the other two times. Protected now, and if it somehow reappears, the poster is banned. BebopKate 02:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

if I see a other I well late you guys duel with it peaceEliskuya2 02:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Today. It's protected, so we should be fine for now. BebopKate 04:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

its back and I find who makes the thing its DISORGANIZATIONXIIILOVER Eliskuya2 21:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I am with you troisnyxetEliskuya2 05:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

He's posting under multiple IPs, so we can only ban the IPs he posts under and block the article names. If this continues, I will alert the Wikia admins to help us out. In the meantime, just post here to let XienZo or me know to delete and keep wiking away as normal. I have also alerted the Disorganization XIII people to keep our bases covered. Just console yourself that you have more of a life than this guy does. ^_^ BebopKate 05:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

I think if I see a other again block the user and the site to the "Disorganizationxiii" thing as well and good night brother Bebop and sister TroisnyxeEliskuya2 11:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Only admins have the power to block users, so right now it's mostly me and XienZo doing the job. And we can only block them if they have one IP address or a username. If they are posting from multiple IPs like some of our more famous past trolls have done, there's really nothing we can do other than block the IPs they are using and protect the pages. Wikia is working on a way to block people who abuse IPs, but it's a long way off in getting done. The only thing we can do at the moment is what we've been doing: revert, protect, and ban. For the record, I think you guys are doing a wonderful job of fixing and keeping up with these things; it's been a huge help to me and XienZo. Just be patient and understand that with the good of the wiki (free editing) comes the bad (vandalizing jerks and trolls).

By the way, I feel this needs to be said: DO NOT SPAM OR DOWNVOTE THE DISORGANIZATION XIII YOUTUBE CHANNEL! The people behind it are not the ones who are doing this; I have been in contact with them. It is one of their fans. They are looking around on their end and have made it clear they are not any happier about it than we are, and have apologized for it. I hope whoever has been doing this realizes the potential damage he or she is doing to something they apparently enjoy. BebopKate 18:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

There's a page called TroisNyxEtienneText, under templates

 * Got it. Thanks for letting us know. ^_^ BebopKate 05:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Arch Behemoth and Destroyed Behemoth
If that's the case, definitely. I'd only make another page if the stats and abilities were different. A redirect from Arch Behemoth and Destroyed Behemoth would be a good idea, too. BebopKate 21:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * As of now, the Behemoth article does not mention Arc or Destroyed Behemoth's at all, and in fact incorrectly reports that regular Behemoth's were seen in the 1000 Heartless battle. Before any deletions occur, how about the sections be merged first?
 * A the Digimon Wiki, we've had a similar problem, and we've dealt with it with a middle ground between the two positions advocated here. As seen in articles like this one, each version of a "type" of enemy is given a section in the page - kind of like a list article. This method could also be applied to Red Nocturne types, so that there's not too much hair-splitting and argumentation - all of that "type" of enemy is in one article, but each gets its own section. So, Soldiers and Stealth Soldiers would be one one page, all five types of mushrooms, etc. The only problem then is figuring out a name for the entire article - I would suggest Behemoth Heartless, Wizard Heartless (as the rhapsodies/nocturnes are all said to be a subset of Wizard class), Soldier Heartless, Mushroom Heartless, etc. (or some version of that naming scheme). This way, you could


 * 1) Get rid of short, stubby articles, by changing them into short sections of a larger page
 * 2) Allow readers to directly and easily compare variations of a central theme
 * 3) Allow editors to see how the other sections are formatted, allowing for greater unity of article design between similar enemies.
 * Really, the only problem with this approach is determining the name of the merged article, but that shouldn't be too hard. Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon  survived intact.  20:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Swordman Island
Just because there's little info about V CAST dosen't mean we should delete pages about it. Shouldn't this wiki include info about all things KH?  Myself 123  23:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, my thoughts exactly. Just because it's V-Cast doesn't mean it's not Kingdom Hearts, which means it should remain on the Kingdom Hearts Wiki. Xahno 00:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)