Talk:Sora's Heartless

Don't we already have Shadow Form? Glorious  CHAOS!  06:52, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Thats form this is a character. --Cococrash11 07:04, January 12, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11
 * But Shadow Form is specifically about Sora as a Shadow Heartless. This page seems to be saying that that same being is the final boss of coded, which would suggest a merge. Glorious  CHAOS!  07:26, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Shadow Form talks about how you got to play as Sora's Heartless but this one deals with biography. --Cococrash11 07:38, January 12, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11
 * Excuse me for butting in and all, but Shadow Form is Sora as a Heartless. This is Sora's Heartless. They seem to be the same character. I don't really like the idea of having one page for the form and one for the character, not only is it somewhat redundant in my opinion, but neither page acknowledges the other one. Unrelated, but would the brief playability of Shadow Sora count Sora's Heartless as a playable character?--Otherarrow 11:51, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Sora's Heartless appear as a main atoginast the source of Bug BLock and he's a boss in coded. --Cococrash11 18:37, January 12, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11
 * Okay, let me put it this way. If the boss of coded is in fact Sora's own Heartless, then the pages will be merged, and Sora's Heartless (Boss) probably will too. Glorious  CHAOS!  19:57, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Instead of Shadow Form maybe Sora's Heartless is a playable Character like Sora, Riku, and etc. He can be first played in the first game. --Cococrash11 20:07, January 12, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11
 * ...that IS Shadow Form. That's exactly what Shadow Form is. Glorious  CHAOS!  20:13, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

So put all of the information of Shadow Form in Sora's Heartless? --Cococrash11 20:19, January 12, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11

So when are you going to put all of Shadow Form's info in Sora's Heartless? --Cococrash11 06:22, January 13, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11

Isn't better to merge it with the Sora's Heartless boss page instead of shadow form, at least for now.Masgrande 22:28, January 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * If I recall, we have separate pages for bosses. (For example, no one suggests merging Xemnas with Xemnas (Boss)) Shadow Form, on the other hand, is the Heartless form of Sora, which has been retroactively made a separate character. Merging the main page with the boss page would be inconsistent with other pages (aside from Lingering Sediment), while not merging with Shadow Form would lead us with having two pages on the exact same thing, which is pretty redundant I'd say.--Otherarrow 00:54, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Merging
I heard there will be a discussion about Shadow Form merging into Sora's Heartless article but I didn't see anyone debating about it. --Cococrash11 01:56, January 16, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11

How do you merge an article anyway? --Cococrash11 06:33, January 16, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11

Question about the quote
When did Soras heartless say that?I thought heartless didnt talk. Kaialone14 17:13, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

he say that in KH coded--Xabryn 18:23, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

Trivia
Wheres Shadow Form's Trvia section? I thought mergeing means put all the trivia info in Sora's Heartless trvia? --Cococrash11 02:28, January 26, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11
 * The trivia was already incorporated into the Story section.--Otherarrow 10:16, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Playable Character
Sora's Heartless is like a temporary playable character in KHI not a form. Since he is a minor character in KHI and a major antagonist in coded. So Sora's Heartless count as a playable character. --Cococrash11 06:02, January 27, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11

Character
He is a character in KHI like Xehanort's Heartless. I mean we all know that Lingering Sentiment is Terra but with his soul but they are still diffrent. Sora's Heartless had Sora's Heart but covered with darkness. Its the same logic with Lingering Sentiment and Sora's Heartless. --Cococrash11 05:02, February 5, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11

Beside at that time in KHI when Sora created and become Sora's Heartless he was falling into darkness and Sora's Heartless took control until Kairi bring Sora back. Sora even commented to Kairi that when he falls into darkness he lost feeling, forget everything and etc. So this proves Sora's Heartless took control when Sora falls into darkness. So this proves that Sora's Heartless is a real character. --Cococrash11 05:02, February 5, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11
 * This makes him not a Shadow how—Urutapu 20:28, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * This makes him not a Shadow how—Urutapu 20:28, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Sora's Heartless and Sora
Sora's Heartless and Sora are totally diffrent character. Kairi filled Sora's Heartless with light and the real Sora returned. Sora's Heartless just remained in Sora's Heart. --Cococrash11 01:28, February 10, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11
 * ...but you play as the Heartless. It's clearly still you, and Axel later mentions that Sora is one of the only beings who retained human form as a Heartless. Sora is canonically a Heartless from Hollow Bastion to Twilight Town. Glorious  CHAOS!  01:37, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

You know what I don't get it. Why is Sora a pseudo Heartless I 'm sure Nomura didn't mention Sora as a pesdo Heartless? --Cococrash11 01:45, February 10, 2010 (UTC)Coccocrash11
 * Kryten, I'm fairly sure Axel simply says that he retained his memories as a Heartless. I could be wrong though. And Cococrash, I always have an unnecessarily difficult time deciphering what you say. Hint.—Urutapu 04:19, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

All I'm saying is that Sora and Sora's Heartless are diffrent character to each other simple as that. --Cococrash11 05:01, February 10, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11

Axel: There was a time he became a Heartless. And if one becomes a Heartless---

Larxene: They lose their minds and their feelings... They're consumed by the darkness.

Axel: Right. But not Sora. He held on to his feelings, even as a Heartless. And there's only one other man who's been able to do just that.

Okay, Axel doesn't say the human form bit.


 * Secret Ansem Report: Sora and Xehanort retained their selfhood even after becoming Heartless.
 * Secret Ansem Report: Likewise, Roxas is Sora's Nobody, but was left behind because Sora's Heartless regained human form using Kairi's heart instead of his own.

However, it does seem clear that Sora neither regained his body, or Kairi's body - some weird light thing happened, and while he has human form, he is still in essence a being of the heart only. I would say that "pseudo-Heartless" would describe that pretty well. However, there probably is some source somewhere that explains what exactly Nomura calls this thing, so if someone finds that, we need to rewrite the page again. Glorious  CHAOS!  05:35, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Look in coded it is revealed that he's a character even in KHI so please its a character not a form. --Cococrash11 06:16, February 10, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11
 * It is a Heartless form of Sora. Glorious  CHAOS!  07:51, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Look how about makeing it he's a character in KHI and coded. But a form for Sora throughout KHI to KHII. I mean the real Sora's Heartless appeared in KHI and coded. But Sora at that time is a pseudo Heartless from KHI to KHII. So lets mention he's a character and a form for Sora at the same time. --Cococrash11 23:49, February 10, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11
 * I have absolutely no idea what you just said. Glorious  CHAOS!  05:12, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

I'm saying don't change "Sora's Heartless is the Heartless of Sora" --Cococrash11 06:37, February 11, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11


 * We have to, circular definitions are not allowed. It doesn't explain anything. It's just like saying "A brain surgeon is a surgeon of the brain" - unless people do know, for example, what a surgeon is, and what a brain is, it's not going to explain anything. Similar case with this. We have to restructure the first sentence. Sulu mata  engkudu !  07:33, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Why the heck Xehanort's Heartless is an exception? Also its not just a frickin form its also a character and form. Sora's Heartless appear in KHI as a Shadow as a character and coded as a main antagonist. And your so called form appeared in KHI when Kairi bring Sora back to KHII. --Cococrash11 21:25, February 11, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11

Sora's Heartless is the Heartless of Sora. This sentence isn't wrong it shows that Sora's Heartless's orginal form is Sora. I mean in Xehanort's Heartless, Xemnas to Saix. Roxas, and Naimine had "Name is the "creature" of Orginal being. Theres nothing wrong with it. --Cococrash11 21:42, February 11, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11
 * On the contrary, Cococrash. "Sora's Heartless is the Heartless of Sora" is very wrong and redundant. Common knowledge will show you that with the two words "Sora" and "Heartless", you can safely assume that the article is about Sora's Heartless.

Also, about the whole "Name is the "creature" of Original being" is correct. Your talking about two different people, not forms. Plus that sentence isn't redundant. From the point of a reader/new user reading an article, a sentence saying "Roxas is the Nobody of Sora." explains alot (even if they haven't played the series). The sentence "Sora's Heartless is the Heartless of Sora." On the other hand does explain that the article of Sora's Heartless, but is very redundant and pointless. The user could figure what the article was about just by using the words "Sora's Heartless."-- Xion 4  ever  22:32, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Does that applies to Xehanort's Heartless too? Also then why do you decided to change "Xehanort's Heartless is the Heartless of Xehanort"? --Cococrash11 22:56, February 11, 2010 (UTC) Cococrash11

I don't understand; I've read his article and have yet to find the sentence "Xehanort's Heartless is the Heartless of Xehanort."-- Xion 4  ever  23:01, February 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * @Xion:That's because it was recently changed.-- Random! to a point!  23:04, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it has been changed, and it should stay that way. Anything with circular definitions for opening sentences needs to be changed. Sulu mata  engkudu !  00:49, February 12, 2010 (UTC)