Talk:Kingdom Hearts HD 1.5 ReMIX

NAME CONFUSION

 * It's 1.5. The 1 just looks like an "I" to emphasize that it's an HD remake of the first Kingdom Hearts.  Official website information, and press information all refer to it as "1.5", not "I.5". --Tektek (talk) 04:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Name Change
Just gotta say this, but the article's title is wrong. It should be the way it's written (and pronounced!): "Kingdom Hearts HD 1.5 ReMIX". --68.230.252.5 03:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Do this thing. 04:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't. T_T  Doesn't look like I can move it.  But YOU the admin should be able to!  --Tektek (talk) 04:32, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The official website and all press coverage refer to it as Kingdom Hearts 1.5 HD ReMIX, not Kingdom Hearts HD 1.5 ReMIX. The logo looks the way it does to appear balanced. --Knehcs (talk) 09:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * You're probably right, I've shouldn't have moved the page so fast, but is it with the hyphens/dashs or without? --ShardofTruth (talk) 09:47, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Can we get some links? The official page doesn't just have "HD 1.5" in the logo; scroll down the page... -- 13:17, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * ....Guys? Guys.  It's "HD 1.5 ReMIX", NOT "1.5 HD ReMIX."  I don't see how you can possibly find the latter on the website and site sources....when it's clearly the former, you know, pretty much everywhere.  This is confounding.  --Tektek (talk) 16:09, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Ok, people, seriously now. The title needs to be changed back. --Tektek (talk) 21:37, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

The official site displays "1.5 HD ReMIX" twice. maggosh 22:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * The title of that same page is "KINGDOM HEARTS -1.5 HD ReMIX- | SQUARE ENIX". On the other hand, the kana on the page says "キングダム ハーツ HD1.5リミックス", and the Message from the Kingdom says "KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5 ReMIX-" and "キングダム ハーツ エイチディ　ワンポイントファイブ リミックス".
 * So we may have to call it a wash until additional sources become available. -- 23:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

One last little thing



 * 3 I have absolutely no idea how to implement these on the pages, but here's a top icon.  --Tektek (talk) 04:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Stop changing the freaking logo people =_=
Until an official transparent logo is out in the wild, stick with the one I uploaded. It's higher resolution than the one from the official website. Not to mention, it has a white background - compared to the site's that has a black. It causes a huge contrast with the ALL THE OTHER PAGES, and just generally looks like crap. Don't be difficult and senselessly stubborn. Just because it's from the official website doesn't make it the go-to-image, especially when there's a considerably better alternative. --Tektek (talk) 05:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Official trumps fanart. maggosh 13:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * ...What. The.  Shit.  It's not fanart, you twat!  It's the official logo from Famitsu!  What is wrong with you?  --Tektek (talk) 15:57, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it's the official logo taken from the JP site, just the brightness of the Disney and SquareEnix lettering were reversed so they can be seen against the white background. --ShardofTruth (talk) 14:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Nothing's been reversed in this logo. NOTHING.  It's the exact same palette as the one from the site.  It just LOOKS that way because the background is white with this one - the logo looks darker, while the other looks lighter.  Kingdom Hearts has never had a black/dark grey logo before, so it's a slightly jarring difference to the eyes.  --Tektek (talk) 16:12, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh wow. Lol.  Maggosh, you gorram hypocrite.  ttp://www.khwiki.net/images/2/2c/Kingdom_Hearts_II_Final_Mix_Logo_KHIIFM.png  I am not a moron - it's painfully easy to see that this logo is a photoshop, seeing as how pristine the logo itself is while the "Final Mix" is blurry because it has been up-ressed.  Now, see, THAT, is "fanart."  Yet you seem perfectly fine with that being up there.  So, once again, unless Kryten says there is something truly evil and abominable about the one I uploaded, LEAVE IT ALOOOONE!  --Tektek (talk) 16:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Three things: Don't insult other users, this will most likely get you a warning. You're old image is still there, please don't reupload another one and stick to the name convention next time and don't post comments all over a conversation, this is confusing. --ShardofTruth (talk) 16:29, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the first. As to the second, no it wasn't - looks like Maggosh deleted it.  When I tried going directly to the link, it just forwarded me to the image upload page. --Tektek (talk) 16:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I did not delete it, you spoony bard. maggosh 17:40, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Well somebody did - right after you replaced it. So, insane troll logic dictates that it's all your fault. :<  --Tektek (talk) 18:35, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It wasn't deleted it was moved, and I uploaded an originally transparent image. 20:41, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. Thanks for clarifying.  It's still Maggosh's fault.  Everything is. --Tektek (talk) 21:36, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I would really appreciate it, Tektek, if you stop being to rude the users. Just explain things calmly and politely. And like ShardofTruth said, do not insult the users, otherwise you will be receiving a warning for verbal attacks on a user.-- 21:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Things

 * Logo and Title: As with Days and Dream Drop Distance, we use the title spelled out in the logo unless Nomura or an Ultimania specifies a different write-out. Days especially is the example here: the title is not necessarily read as its written. The logo does not need to be modified until it's been cleaned (as it has been now). 03:30, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Trailer:
PLEASE ADD THIS: gVH-v1ZbeHk