Talk:Regen

Untitled
Do we really, truly need this article? You know how I feel about this sort of article... - 10:19, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I saw it on the Wanted Articles bit and that's why I made it but no, we don't need it. I'll Crush  You!
 * Then I really think it should be deleted. The "Wanted Articles" list isn't always up-to-date, or even accurate. - 19:22, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Its a passive ability. Our policy is to give all passive abilities articles, as long as they are formatted properly. Glorious  CHAOS!  22:23, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I concur with KrytenKoro. In addition, EternalNothingnessXIII, some subjects like this one do not have a vast amount of content and information to use, so it does not take as much information to complete the article. -- 05:28, May 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, the command should be merged back in. The status is a status effect, totally agree to keep that separate, but both the ability and command are things that cause that effect -- the enemy cards in CoM can hardly be said to be distinct from commands anyway, seeing as they are clearly the roots of the command system. 02:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Etymology
Is it really necessary because I thought it was obvious that Regen came from Regenerate. Even still we could write a short sentence about it in the first paragraph. 18:03, 5 May 2012 (UTC)