User talk:The Inexistent

Warning
Just for the record, I was attacked first, but I should have gotten that warning for using the term "I hate you" on my attacker (which has since been removed from his talk page). Do you want me to suffer, or do you want to protect me? Uxie  Lover  1994 22:32, 16 April 2011 (EDT)

UotM
No problem. It was shame we couldnt talk earlier, but I seen what you said to Roxas... and... well, I have a lot of respect for you now. You deserved to be featured, not a self-given warning. You are a wonderfull people, even if it seems weird, be proud of that!--''' Dark-En   igmaXIII   17:49, 19 May 2011 (EDT)

Imagespace Auditing
Hi.

This is a reminder that you still have two collections of images to audit, as evidenced by this forum. Please do not forget these, as we are trying to raise awareness that the audit is still not complete, though is very close to being done. Thanks! -- 19:20, 24 May 2011 (EDT)

Moar Imagespace Auditing
WOAH WOAH WOAH.

I'm really not sure why you're nominating official images, like the Mobile files, for deletion, when they are offical, have fine names, and are in .png format. You even nominated an image that was just a .jpg for deletion. To clarify, this is how the audit should be done:


 * Image is fanart, watermarked, or unofficial media = DELETE
 * Image is in any format that is not .png, .gif (such as .jpg) = BETTERPIC
 * Image has a name that is total gibberish, does not properly describe the image, or does not follow the naming standard = BAD NAME

Thanks! -- 21:05, 27 May 2011 (EDT)

.jpgs
If you are marking them for deletion, you need to give a link to the replacement png file. jpgs are NOT supposed to be deleted until they have been replaced, including all of their usages. 19:48, 28 May 2011 (EDT)