User talk:73.76.130.254

"Also like the other KH templates the party members will be ordered in appearance of their respective worlds.)"

That is not how the other navboxes are arranged. I'm confused where you got that impression. 17:10, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * "That is not how the other navboxes are arranged. I'm confused where you got that impression."
 * How is this not making any sense to you, I did this because the other KH Templates had the Party members listed in order of the world's you go to in the game, so i don't see why not to have the party members . If you don't believe me, then look at them before you start "twisting the facts" and having them listed in "alphabetical order" instead:

1. Template:KH 2. Template:COM 3. Template:KH2 4. Template:BBS 5. Template:DDD

Besides, The first round of worlds in KH3 will be the following: Olympus, Toy Story and Monster's Inc. It was from the Translated Famitsu article Famitsu - Kingdom Hearts 3 D23 Japan 2018 & Famitsu-Details-Some-of-KH3-s-World-Order-Pudding-Heartless-Gummi-Ship-Customisation-and-More-11333. Say what you want on how this site likes to be run but the sources I got were cited and reliable information.--73.76.130.254 17:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The first template is not a navbox.
 * The CoM template lists them mostly alphabetically - it's not in game order, because it has Ariel before Jack. The DDD template doesn't have NPC party members.
 * Accusing me of "twisting the facts" is incredibly bad faith and rude. Please don't do it.
 * "the sources I got were cited and reliable information" - khinsider is not a primary source, and the famitsu article didn't say what you were claiming. You seem to have an understanding of what defines a primary source - it means something coming directly from the author themselves, or for example an interview they have approved. Commentary from a fansite is not a primary source. You are not helping the wiki at all by repeatedly neglecting basic prudence and other editors' corrections. 16:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * "You seem to have an understanding of what defines a primary source - it means something coming directly from the author themselves, or for example an interview they have approved.
 * Commentary from a fansite is not a primary source. You are not helping the wiki at all by repeatedly neglecting basic prudence and other editors' corrections."
 * Accusing me of "bad faith and being rude" is incredibly disresspectful from an administrator running this site and going out of line. Please don't do it and it's ironic that 4 months ago that you were going to stop editing on this site, and here you are continuing to heckling me and every non-registerd user saying stuff about the "sources aren't final" "reliable sources are not connected, regardless of good faith" YOU NEED TO STOP YOUR overreaction at me and with anyone. Don't you even accept articles, press releases as reliable sources anymore?--73.76.130.254 21:25, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * "from an administrator" -- I'm not an administrator.
 * "going out of line" -- I've strictly followed the wiki's consensus policy this entire time. As demonstrated by multiple other editors and staff members having the same view.
 * "Accusing me of "bad faith and being rude" is incredibly disresspectful" -- you explicitly accused me of "twisting the facts", i.e., intending to go in and change the navboxes in order to lie about what the precedent was. That's poisoning the well, and it's by definition bad faith.
 * "and it's ironic that 4 months ago that you were going to stop editing on this site" -- even granting for the sake of discussion your misunderstanding of what I had done, what does that have to do with this discussion? Why would that be ironic?
 * "and every non-registerd user" -- no, you're the only IP editor I've seen in the last few months that's breaking the rules and edit warring with multiple members. It sounds like you're trying to derail the discussion and portray this as some sort of "KrytenKoro is a rogue admin who hates IP editors", which doesn't make sense because I am neither (1) going outside of the consensus rules, (2) an admin, or (3) debating with any other IP editor but you. Please focus on the topic, don't try to turn this into victimization farce.
 * "Don't you even accept articles, press releases as reliable sources anymore?" -- posts written by the fans who work on khinsider are not press releases. They are not primary sources. I don't understand why you seem to be implying there is something wrong with not mistakenly believing they are primary sources. A press release or primary source requires direct interaction with the actual authors, not secondhand commentary. They may be informative to fans, but they are no more a primary source than the wiki itself is.
 * "YOU NEED TO STOP YOUR overreaction at me" -- ??? I've reminded you of the wiki's policies, repeatedly, and cleaned up after your edits when you violate those policies. I've put in the work that you have neglected to do in finding acceptable citations for as much of your content as I could. In return, you've gotten increasingly aggressive and defensive against any sort of reminder that you are edit warring and violating policy. I'd like to point out that actual administrators (not just editors like me) have reverted your edits, and yet you keep pushing them through. That kind of behavior usually winds up in a block for edit warring -- though I'll remind you that, since I'm not a staff member, I would not be the one blocking you, so this is not a "KrytenKoro coming down on 73" situation.
 * Dude. Seriously. The game looks like it's going to come out soon. We're getting new, verifiable, primary-sourced info by the day. There are plenty of things you can do to contribute in a way the wiki's policies allow, like writing the sandbox articles. I don't understand why you're so determined to violate policy on a small template that by definition can't even be considered usable until the game is actually released and all this back and forth is moot. 00:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)