Talk:Xigbar

Category
I do believe that Xigbar and the other members should go under Characters and Enemies. I mean, that's what they are. Human Characters is blatant, at the least; because then that opens up unneeded possibilities, such as Disney Characters. And with most of the characters being from Disney, there isn't much point there. As for enemies... Well, that's what they are. I know for somethings the Parent Category is bad. But for others it makes sense; if somebody is just browsing, I doubt they'd go to each sub-category. They'd just want to see who the enemies are, boss or no. I do hope I'm making sense; this is REALLY hard for me to explain. I have lost track of where it was taught to me, but...yeah. I'm for the Characters and Enemies categories (though I guess you could already tell that, 'cause I'm the one who slipped them in there). Woo.--Dreyfus 04:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, they should go for the subcategories if they're browsing, since they're the first on the category pages, before the entries. If they're looking for someone particular, they'll be easily categorized there, and if they're just browsing, the subcategory tree is actually designed for that in the Mediawiki software.  I'm not opposed to doing things differently for its own sake, but organizations with far more wiki experience than us do it this way across a large variety of wikis.
 * Also, I was planning on making a Category:Disney Characters :(. It doesn't seem like any "child" categories would be a bad idea unless they had too few members, not too many.
 * And if these categories are included, they need to go in, not simply on this page, so they are included in all the Organization members' pages. Still though, redundant categories in my opinion just lead to categories being less useful IMO (see my reply at DELETE, on a similar subject.)  Scott ch 04:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Help with the Data Replica

 * Check Bizkit's vids, you can't get any better than that; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xlYZotba7U The point is spamming reflect to parry his gun arrows, so he gets stunned. XienZo 04:13, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Other Keyblade Masters
http://www.kingdomhearts3.net/scenario-mysteries-interview/comment-page-41/

"Question: We’d like to inquire about the new secret movie “Birth By Sleep”. In the new event “The Truth about the Chamber of Sleep”, Xigbar mentions a “group that wields Keyblades”. Is he talking about the 3 armored people in the movie?

Nomura: Yes, Xigbar witnessed them when he was a disciple to Ansem the Wise."

I wonder, is it possible then, that Xigbar, Ansem and the other apprentices will appear in Birth by Sleep? Maybe even be fought? Drake Clawfang 06:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

I am not a pro of PCs or laptops xigg I am useing my step mother's anyway I was thinking it was xigbar but lets wait for troisnyx. T-TEliskuya2 22:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Since Xigbar seems to know the most about the Keyblade War, and he doesn't really like Xemnas, I wonder if Xigbar was supposed to be a Keyblade wielder, but it chose Terra instead of him, and I think Terra turns into Xehanort... I guess we can only wait... --Morghman

Check this out: http://www.square-enix.co.jp/kingdom/days/

Xigbar and Demyx in higher quality

Xigbar vs Ven (Xion)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZwk5zc71yg

one thing that bothered me about that: Xigbar got distracted upon seeing Xion as Ven, but his reaction to roxas' uncanny resemblance to Ven is not stated anywhere. (or maybe i just haven't encountered it -.-)--121.54.92.102 09:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Could someone tell me what he said at that moment, or in what day does it happen?

er, day 354, i think.

Xigbar's Name
I wonder if Xigbar's name is pronounced Shig-Bar, you know, like Mar-lu-Sha or Shi-on. Winxfan1 17:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Winxfan1

Taunting Sora
No. The voices are totally different. And you'll notice Xigbar asks again later in the game "Have you been a good boy?". That's Xigbar. -EO

Nickname
That was rather surprising.--天下 無双 ！！  19:37, September 26, 2009 (UTC)

Sora
When Xigbar told Sora "That's right! He used to give me that exact same look!" was he talking about Ven?
 * No. He was talking about Roxas. - EternalNothingnessXIII 20:07, October 24, 2009 (UTC)

I just thought that the comment Xigbar made to Xion when she had Ven's apperance and how Ven used looked at him was related to the one he made to Sora.

Are we really sure he meant Roxas? I mean it seems that way but Xigbar probably is the type to screw with someone like that.

Okay it could be that Ven is the originator of "the look" but Roxas (and Xion) continued it's usage up until He saw Sora in Radiant garden and decided to note the history of the situation.70.144.124.185 13:50, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

Days Fight
I was just wondering if we should make a small mention on the Xigbar enemy page about the battle in Days at the Coliseum ? i realise its a trivial battle and not that important but i do feel it sould atleast have a little mention/strategy. What do you people think ? Ximodnic 01:07, October 25, 2009 (UTC)

"Ill Will"?
Something in the Personality section's bugging me. The idea that there's ill will between Xigbar and Xemnas and Saix seems like a bit of a stretch, as it's been shown that the numerical ranks aren't related to authority, which begs the question of why mention of Xigbar's rank is even in the Personality section. I'm going to make changes accoringly.LapisScarab 23:43, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

That's fine with me.-- Ninja Sheik  23:47, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

It's actually FINE. Read the reasoning in the history. Xigbar's comedic, carefree nature is something viewed as "un-Nobody", especially for a Senior Member, and it's annoying to Xemnas and Saix, who take their ADMINISTRATIVE jobs seriously, and don't bother with the easier field missions that Xigbar takes. Both of these are PERSONALITY referances. Simply make the writing clearer. Don't erase it. - EternalNothingnessXIII 23:52, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

How about if just the "Some have wondered" sentence is removed? That's really what's bugging me the most. It's just too speculative. We have no way of knowing if that is the reason Xigbar isn't given a lot of authority. But you're right about the rest of the section and after looking it over, it does fit. LapisScarab 04:13, November 19, 2009 (UTC)