Talk:Simba and Nala's cub

Origin section
Isn't the "Origin" section way too long? It's nearly an essay is size. ;P —Kaimi (talk) 12:31, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, origin sections are meant to be concise summaries- no more than a paragraph or two long. Feel free to condense or rewrite it. 13:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I only watched the first The Lion King so I'm afraid that my tries to keep it short and to the point would be in terrible. I think I'll let someone more knowledgable do this.—Kaimi (talk) 14:22, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hahaha... ^_^; I'm sorry, that's my bad. I'm detailed when I do my summaries. I tried not to make too long, but I ended making it long in spite of that. But I don't know how to condense it into smaller size without leaving out the important points in the plot. :P-- 19:38, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

I have tried to cut it down as best as I could. If someone can do better, by all means do so. Origin sections are not meant to detail the full movie- hence the Wikipedia links. A good origin section for a main character, movie wise, would be Hercules. Not sure if this is of any help, but I'll leave it here. 23:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I did most of the Origins sections when I was off during my holidays in college. I'm still on summer break, and I finished reading some books I wanted to read over the summer, so I'll go and look back on them and see what I can do.-- 03:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Not Kiara
Considering the whole thing we had with Shark, I think it's perfectly reasonable to rename this "Simba's child". -- 05:46, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Agreed. If it's not named in Kingdom Hearts as "Kiara", it's not okay to assume so or call it that here. - 14:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Sounds fine to me. I'm assuming we're safe to move then? 17:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Does that mean we have to remove the Origins section, too? I worked really hard on it. T _ T-- 19:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

No, the origin section is still needed. However, the page needs to be rewritten under the examples on Shark and Maleficent's Raven. So, the opening line of the origin section would be something like: "Simba's child, known as Kiara ref, originates from the ' and its sequel '." 19:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Except, saying the child is known as Kiara is the same as accepting the "assumption" of having the article named Kiara. The same is true if we keep the origin, it's accepting that the child is Kiara, which we're supposedly rejecting on the basis that there's no proof in the games that it's actually Kiara. I don't think it's necessary to move it. After all, Kingdom Hearts builds on the Disney universe, it doesn't recreate it. There's nothing wrong with leaving it as Kiara because it's a safely-accepted fact. It might get more confusing and weird to deny that it's Kiara, even if there's nothing in the actual games that says it is. 23:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Needs to be merged into Pride Lands or renamed "Simba and Nala's cub"
The kana, as far as I can tell, are fake. 13:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Wouldn't "Unnamed Lion Cub" be a better fit? I mean, we don't technically know that she or he is Simba's real child. I'm half-joking, by the way. 19:52, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree with with merging into the Pride Lands page, as this is how we usually deal with characters who only made cameo appearances and/or mentioned in the franchise, but have no plot relevance to the games itself.-- 20:40, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree with NinjaSheik. The appearance is very minor, so it doesn't really deserve its own page. 21:44, 5 July 2018 (UTC)