User talk:Evnyofdeath

Welcome!
To use it you type: If you type that out and put the text in between "text=" and the ending brackets a talk bubble will appear. -- 20:36, March 25, 2010 (UTC) FIXED IT! But you gotta change the Envyofdeath in the coding to Evnyofdeath. -- 21:34, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Ven
Find it first. Xigbar and possibly Xemnas make vague remarks, but I don't think Axel does. At any rate, I'm not sure it counts as "revealing" anything. --Neumannz 16:23, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

re: bond of flame
Indeed. However, considering, that the addition of Units can allow the Dream Sword, as well as the regular Bond of Flame, to overtake the Strength of Bond of Flame+, and the unfortunate vagueness and tenuousness of calling any weapon "the strongest" requires that we use that phrase as carefully as possible. --  Neumannz ,  The Dark Falcon  22:32, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

Interesting thing I stumbled upon
Hey envyofdeath plz stop deleting my post when u do that I cant comment u cant delete a comment cause u dont like it thats called ABUSING YOUR POWER I used no profanity nothing bad but everywhere I turn my stuff is gone now plz stop!If u dont like it then dont reply now whereever u moved my stuff to put it back caused Im realy ticked of!Im REALLY ANNOYED stop deleting my stuff I tried to come on and have fun but your stoping that!NOW PUT THEM BACK SO I CAN COMMENT NORMALLY!

Also u dont like me to make fake theories when u have a FAN FICTION of your own if I bother u then dont talk to me anymore after u put my comments back!

The truth dosen't hurt
I told you already, what you said is true, and i have no problem with it. Love ya <3-FatalMercy 16:17, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Then tell me why you got so worked up. --Evnyofdeath 16:18, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

On second thought, don't. I don't want you on my talk page, so please respect that and leave me be. --Evnyofdeath 16:19, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Dude...
Sorry, I just wanted to make sure I created the page correctly before adding stuff. It's my first created page, alright? Superdog1123 01:58, October 18, 2010 (UTC)Superdog1123
 * Okay, but thats what the preview button is for. --Evnyofdeath 01:59, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Well, thanks, now I know. I'll remember that for next time.Superdog1123 02:12, October 18, 2010 (UTC)Superdog1123

Sephiroth Voice Actor
Why did you revert that? You're right in saying that FM didn't come out in the US or UK, the point is that NONE OF THE OTHER ENGLISH CHARACTERS HAVE THEIR ACTORS LISTED TWICE. Haley Joel Osment is ONLY in English actors (and NOT in Japanese) because he's ONLY an English voice actor. Just because he's in a Japanese game does not make him a "Japanese Voice Actor" for the Final Mix version. If we're changing Sephiroth in this manner, we have to change... let's see... Sora, Kairi, Riku, Mickey, Xemnas, Ansem the Wise, Cloud, Tifa, Yuffie, Tidus, Wakka, Selphie, Leon... and the list goes on. The only reason I haven't already undone your revert is to prevent edit warring. So x ra ]] 06:18, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Our interpretations obviously differ --Evnyofdeath 06:20, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * ...how does that justify the revert? This is about consistency. What makes Sephiroth different from Cloud? Why isn't Steve Burton listed under Japanese actors for him? He's in the Final Mix. So x ra  ]] 06:21, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it doesn't solve inconsistency, however the way I see it should be solved, and the way YOU see it should be solved differ. --Evnyofdeath 06:22, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * There's three outcomes to this: A) put him under English only, B) leave him under both, C) change all other articles to have them under both. C is a ridiculous notion, B is inconsistent (and incorrect), and you're saying A is a bad idea. So what's your solution? So x ra  ]] 06:25, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why are you being so harsh? The way I interperate "English Voice Actor" and "Japanese Voice Actor" is who voiced the character in the respective version. --Evnyofdeath 06:27, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm being "harsh" because you're resisting a change that enforces consistency, all so that the page is shown in your "interpretation". The point of this is that none of the other character articles are written in this fashion, so this one shouldn't be either. So x ra  ]] 06:30, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Obviously my interpretation is the one taken by most of the users of the wiki, otherwise this would have been brought up before. And I'm not resisting, I'm simply taking a similar stance to you, but in a different direction. --Evnyofdeath 06:31, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably the reason it's never been brought up is a lack of attention to detail between differing pages. I don't see how our stances are similar at all; you want to leave one page different from all the other ones... while it should fit the same pattern. So x ra  ]] 06:34, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * God, I assumed you'd be able to read between the lines, as 90% of the wiki does. Either way, it ridiculously late so I'm going to sleep. --Evnyofdeath 06:36, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and do that. You can call my behavior "reading between the lines" if you want, but I prefer to call it "actually caring about consistency." Night. So x ra  ]] 06:37, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * TRY READING MY COMMENT. I never said you read between the lines, I said you DIDN'T. --Evnyofdeath 06:39, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Maybe I shouldn't butt in, but I think the VA section was better before. It's like, Sora's English VA is Haley Joel Osment and his Japanese VA is Takuto Yoshinaga, not in the NA/E version of the game he is voiced by Haley and since FM is Japanese game Haley is to be put under the "Japanese VA" category. Besides, it's kind of confusing to see the English VA's name put under the Japanese category, even though with the KHFM tag.

Re: Maybe, but......
Well, that's not right. We're supposed to be a community, we can't let a single member do anything he/she wants. Besides, s/he's not even an admin (or does s/he?) I think we should make a poll or discussion or something.
 * I think your right, but it was midnight and I just wanted him off my back so I could get to sleep. --Evnyofdeath 16:10, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

You should've just ignored him you know, it's not like he'll appear beside your bed or anything. I think we should make a discussion about this on the forum.
 * I start getting irrational when I'm tired. --Evnyofdeath 16:15, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

ah, I see. Then I'll make the discussion, you go and have a good rest, 'kay?.
 * Its already been.......9(?) hours since then, what do you think I've been doing? --Evnyofdeath 16:20, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Discussion for what? maggosh 16:21, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whether or not to include the English VAs in the Japanese VA section for the FM games. --Evnyofdeath 16:23, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Envyofdeath: it was 9 hours ago? wow I didn't notice that :/ Maggosh: Soxra has a suggestion on VA sorting, and, well... let's just say he's not giving the suggestion the right way. So I'll make a new thread to discuss wether we keep our current sorting or do we take note of Soxra's suggestion

The only exception I see is Sephiroth. He had no Jap. VA in KHFM. KHIIFM has Jap. voiced scenes in Theater Mode. End of discussio, I'm not God, here's a ball of Oxyclean. maggosh 16:28, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

warring
I hate when this happens. A point that is, frankly, nearly inconsequential is "debated"--I say "debated", but what it really is is the same people saying the same things over and over again, except increasingly louder and with more hostility. (This is exactly why NeutraVega is a pain in the ass. Otherwise I'd be a fairly big fan of the guy.) Not one of you is adding anything new to your arguments, and I don't mind saying, you're all starting to piss me off.

Now then. I want you to tell me exactly what it says on the Soul Eater page that you don't like, what you think it should be, and why. Don't bother talking about Kryten's sources, I already know why they're good and why they're bad. Tell me your argument. Let me see if I can understand your reasoning. We'll discuss it on this page. -- Neumannz ,  The Dark Falcon  22:49, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I honestly don't think Soul Eater is a Keyblade in and of itself, so I think its article should say that Soul Eater is a sword. --Evnyofdeath 22:55, October 21, 2010 (UTC)

Currently the article says that it both "is a form of one of Riku's Keyblades" and "is a sword that grows more powerful when used with darkness". Both are correct, so I'm assuming your main problem is with the "Riku's swords" template and the categories. Am I right? -- Neumannz ,  The Dark Falcon  23:00, October 21, 2010 (UTC)