User talk:Evnyofdeath

Welcome!
To use it you type: If you type that out and put the text in between "text=" and the ending brackets a talk bubble will appear. -- 20:36, March 25, 2010 (UTC) FIXED IT! But you gotta change the Envyofdeath in the coding to Evnyofdeath. -- 21:34, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Ven
Find it first. Xigbar and possibly Xemnas make vague remarks, but I don't think Axel does. At any rate, I'm not sure it counts as "revealing" anything. --Neumannz 16:23, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

re: bond of flame
Indeed. However, considering, that the addition of Units can allow the Dream Sword, as well as the regular Bond of Flame, to overtake the Strength of Bond of Flame+, and the unfortunate vagueness and tenuousness of calling any weapon "the strongest" requires that we use that phrase as carefully as possible. --  Neumannz ,  The Dark Falcon  22:32, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

Interesting thing I stumbled upon
Hey envyofdeath plz stop deleting my post when u do that I cant comment u cant delete a comment cause u dont like it thats called ABUSING YOUR POWER I used no profanity nothing bad but everywhere I turn my stuff is gone now plz stop!If u dont like it then dont reply now whereever u moved my stuff to put it back caused Im realy ticked of!Im REALLY ANNOYED stop deleting my stuff I tried to come on and have fun but your stoping that!NOW PUT THEM BACK SO I CAN COMMENT NORMALLY!

Also u dont like me to make fake theories when u have a FAN FICTION of your own if I bother u then dont talk to me anymore after u put my comments back!

The truth dosen't hurt
I told you already, what you said is true, and i have no problem with it. Love ya <3-FatalMercy 16:17, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Then tell me why you got so worked up. --Evnyofdeath 16:18, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

On second thought, don't. I don't want you on my talk page, so please respect that and leave me be. --Evnyofdeath 16:19, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Dude...
Sorry, I just wanted to make sure I created the page correctly before adding stuff. It's my first created page, alright? Superdog1123 01:58, October 18, 2010 (UTC)Superdog1123
 * Okay, but thats what the preview button is for. --Evnyofdeath 01:59, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Well, thanks, now I know. I'll remember that for next time.Superdog1123 02:12, October 18, 2010 (UTC)Superdog1123

Sephiroth Voice Actor
Why did you revert that? You're right in saying that FM didn't come out in the US or UK, the point is that NONE OF THE OTHER ENGLISH CHARACTERS HAVE THEIR ACTORS LISTED TWICE. Haley Joel Osment is ONLY in English actors (and NOT in Japanese) because he's ONLY an English voice actor. Just because he's in a Japanese game does not make him a "Japanese Voice Actor" for the Final Mix version. If we're changing Sephiroth in this manner, we have to change... let's see... Sora, Kairi, Riku, Mickey, Xemnas, Ansem the Wise, Cloud, Tifa, Yuffie, Tidus, Wakka, Selphie, Leon... and the list goes on. The only reason I haven't already undone your revert is to prevent edit warring. So x ra ]] 06:18, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Our interpretations obviously differ --Evnyofdeath 06:20, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * ...how does that justify the revert? This is about consistency. What makes Sephiroth different from Cloud? Why isn't Steve Burton listed under Japanese actors for him? He's in the Final Mix. So x ra  ]] 06:21, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it doesn't solve inconsistency, however the way I see it should be solved, and the way YOU see it should be solved differ. --Evnyofdeath 06:22, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * There's three outcomes to this: A) put him under English only, B) leave him under both, C) change all other articles to have them under both. C is a ridiculous notion, B is inconsistent (and incorrect), and you're saying A is a bad idea. So what's your solution? So x ra  ]] 06:25, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why are you being so harsh? The way I interperate "English Voice Actor" and "Japanese Voice Actor" is who voiced the character in the respective version. --Evnyofdeath 06:27, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm being "harsh" because you're resisting a change that enforces consistency, all so that the page is shown in your "interpretation". The point of this is that none of the other character articles are written in this fashion, so this one shouldn't be either. So x ra  ]] 06:30, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Obviously my interpretation is the one taken by most of the users of the wiki, otherwise this would have been brought up before. And I'm not resisting, I'm simply taking a similar stance to you, but in a different direction. --Evnyofdeath 06:31, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably the reason it's never been brought up is a lack of attention to detail between differing pages. I don't see how our stances are similar at all; you want to leave one page different from all the other ones... while it should fit the same pattern. So x ra  ]] 06:34, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * God, I assumed you'd be able to read between the lines, as 90% of the wiki does. Either way, it ridiculously late so I'm going to sleep. --Evnyofdeath 06:36, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and do that. You can call my behavior "reading between the lines" if you want, but I prefer to call it "actually caring about consistency." Night. So x ra  ]] 06:37, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * TRY READING MY COMMENT. I never said you read between the lines, I said you DIDN'T. --Evnyofdeath 06:39, October 19, 2010 (UTC)