Category talk:Characters

This
This really shouldn't go on articles. It should be a parent category for sub-categories. - Azul 8  1677  22:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed, should we go ahead and remove it from all pages? Ultima The   High Seraph  17:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Neumannz, can you run AWB to remove "Characters" from individual character pages? It may be encoded within the Enemy infobox, also. 18:20, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * It was in the Party navbox, actually. They're all gone except for that one @$$hole's user- and talkpages. -- 22:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * They haven't actually been taken out of the list, at least on my end. If you see the same thing, could you run AWB just to give them a refresh? 23:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

I already did. Try clearing your cache. -- 23:53, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Subcategories
We have a mass of subcategories that aren't complementary here, so I propose we split them up into a tree:


 * Characters
 * Characters by type
 * Heartless
 * Nobodies (poss. obsolete Replica)
 * Unversed
 * Dream Eaters
 * Data (possibly Simulations or Constructs, to include Lingering Will and The Experiment?)
 * Others (obsolete out "Somebodies")
 * Characters by game
 * self-evident
 * Characters by company
 * Disney characters
 * Square Enix characters
 * Groups
 * Organization XIII
 * Princesses of Heart
 * Keyblade Masters
 * Keyblade wielders
 * Summons
 * D-Links
 * All current pages within Groups
 * Characters by role
 * Allies
 * Enemies
 * Villains
 * Neutral characters
 * Summons
 * D-Links

Thoughts? 18:20, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Agree. -- 20:57, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * In regards to obsoleting out "Somebody" for "Other" (and somebodies for others)...are we, at long last, all agreed on this? Or does that bit need to wait? 21:04, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, I moved Summons and D-Links to role, as they have a specific gameplay role. I did not move Keyblade wielders and masters, because the franchise clearly portrays that as a group, even if it is defined by in-fighting. It could perhaps be moved to type, though I doubt it. 21:09, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

"Somebodies" should NOT be replaced with "others", just with "other". (And yes, there is a difference.) -- 21:21, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You'll have to enlighten me, then.
 * Also, I made a tactical error with "Characters of unknown worlds", and it currently includes a lot of non-characters. It looks like it is slowly draining out, but if somebody wanted to run AWB with "change File: to File:" and save despite there being no changes on the pages in the category... 22:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

I won't be able to run AWB for a while, but I'll get to it when I get to it.

"Others" implies that "other" is a type in and of itself, as opposed to being the non-type, so to speak. Technically people could still make that mistake anyway, but then it's their own damn fault. -- 22:20, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Ooooh! No, I mean the category "Somebodies" should have all members moved over to "Others". If someone interprets the category to mean that "Others" is a type...well, that's pretty weak of them. The enemy infobox can be fixed for it in a jeff, as soon as you are ready to run AWB and if we are all agreed. 22:32, 7 March 2012 (UTC)