KHWiki talk:Roundtable

Okay, I suck when it comes to time, so can someone tell me what 9:00 in Wiki time translates to on the United States East Coast?00:21, 7 May 2011 (EDT)
 * Um.. I think it's like 2:00 pm. I live in US East Coast, too. -- 00:28, 7 May 2011 (EDT)
 * Thanks, Crono. I hope I can make this one...00:34, 7 May 2011 (EDT)
 * Nine AM or Nine PM? 10:32, 7 May 2011 (EDT)
 * PM. -- 11:24, 7 May 2011 (EDT)

East Coast: 5:00 PM

Central: 4:00 PM

Mountain: 3:00 PM

Pacific: 2:00 PM

11:44, 7 May 2011 (EDT)
 * I've made a list of some common time zones and their relation to UTC (Wiki Time) here. Should we put something like this on the Roundtable page to avoid future confusion? 12:06, 7 May 2011 (EDT)
 * That would help; we want to make it as easy to get to these meetings as possible, ya?12:19, 7 May 2011 (EDT)

Done... kinda. A collapsable format may be better... 12:31, 7 May 2011 (EDT)
 * It looks good! But a little bit... messy... Does anyone know of a way to align the tables side by side, and then we could put them into a collapsed section or something maybe? 12:34, 7 May 2011 (EDT)

New Meeting
When has the meeting been rescheduled for? 13:38, 11 June 2011 (EDT)
 * 11/6/2011 9pm UTC 0 13:48, 11 June 2011 (EDT)

Well, since I won't be here, these are my opinions on the items
 * 1) We forgot this last time, so it doesn't really matter to me.
 * 2) I find the majority of off site accounts completely useless. I even find the Facebook account as such, as I even had to manually invite Kryten and Bluer, otherwise they would have never found it.
 * 3) Self explanatory, really. I've already started on the enemies, but I would be willing to do much more if I can find the time.
 * 4) This was mainly directed twords stuff like the Featured Media change, but that is now in effect. But, there is also stuff like the walkthroughs, the main page change, etc.
 * 5) Post audit, what I think needs to be done: finish the image crap, set up some sort of wiki bot to watch over the image space and notify someone when jpg's/ gibberish name images are uploaded, create these walkthroughs, find more affiliates (like actual KH news related websites), and really get to work on all of the different "Project:"'s that have popped up.
 * 6) I vote Erry, if he's willing.


 * I'll pull a T I here, as there's a good chance I won't be able to make it as well.
 * The Trinity archives don't really concern me; as long as they're maybe updated a little more frequently and efficiently or whatnot I'm good.
 * I believe offsite accounts should be used primarily for the Trinity Archives. I brought this up at the last Roundtable. As for the things that can't really serve that function, such as the deviantart account, I don't really see the purpose of having them. The biased and discriminatory rules the deviantART account on the subject of yaoi/yuri also disturbs me, and if I make it to the meeting, I really really want to talk about this, even if it is a little off topic.
 * What T I said; I'd be glad to help out in this case, but who specifically works on this/volunteers is of no concern to me.
 * Post-audit, as T I said, all of the image work needs closure. Also, Doorsey and I were discussing having a thing on the main page to commemorate everyone who worked on the audit, similar to the Keyblade War winner thing from a few months ago. Please talk about this.
 * I am indifferent to the Mirage Arena.
 * -- 15:26, 11 June 2011 (EDT)

August 6th, 2011
Since these things are always on the Saturdays when I have to work I will not be here, I'll leave my opinions on the talk page again.
 * 1) No opinion.
 * Yes, the new system is a lot more fun.
 * 1) I'm in favor of the way I handled it. I think it would work, unless we want to institute a tie breaking system.
 * 2) There needs to be a separate section for each member wiki, and a contact list of admins. Also, SOMEBODY RESPOND TO THIS.
 * 3) I really don't care. I prefer to read the logs anyway.
 * 4) Of no consequence to me.
 * 5) This should be started ASAP. I know we should be focusing on the audit, but a lot of people don't seem to want to do it.  In addition, the wiki has been literally DEAD the last few days because Kryten, Neumannz, Erry, me, etc. have not been on as much.  HOWEVER, a walkthrough would rally the community, I believe.  Also, people who are doing strategy sections and stuff should post their drafts on a Walkthrough:GAME/Draft, so the gnomes can fix the sections up without getting edit conflicted 10,000 times.
 * 6) I suppose there should be some rules, but none should go as extreme as the PG rule went. That made breaking the rule FUN, inviting inapropriate behavior.  alsoihaznoproblemzcuncurningazulspeek.

Please use this. 17:44, 4 August 2011 (EDT)

I also will be absent, sorry! I will also leave my opinions on the matters.
 * 1) This needs to be explained better for me to create an opinion on the matter. Simply put, I have no clue what you are talking about.
 * 2) I would like to continue ut--our imagespace is thriving and large enough to support changing it far more often that only once a month.
 * 3) First nominated was used; perhaps we could roll the other tied image over to the following month?
 * 4) WE NEED TO COMPLETE THE SITE ASAP. I like the format as it is now, but please, it needs to be ABSOLUTELY COMPLETED before it is presented to potential wiki partners.
 * 5) If we aren't going to have logs available for the roundtables, we might as well not have them at all. This is the only way to make it available for the entire community, and it needs to be done. Specifics users, perhaps, could be appointed to handle the logging and summarizing.
 * 6) OH DON'T BE ALL BUTTHURT ERRY. The format that has always been used for the Trinity Archives has been a title with the date related to the subject, the user's name with the POSTING DATE, and then the text. Changing the posting date is outright dishonest and looks TERRIBLE. Also, I posted a forum topic on adding a comment forum thread that coincides with each future post of the Trinity Archives, please go see that it, it seemed to be well received.
 * 7) A community walkthrough would be a large project, and rules and regulations of the writing style and format will need to be created before it the walkthrough itself is created. I prefer all professionalism in a wiki-created project. HOWEVER. I am not opposed to users also hosting their own personally written walkthroughs in their userspace. If we have enough of these in high quality, we can discuss hosting them in the walkthroughspace.
 * 8) oyouseemmadaboutsomethingthatreallyisnobigdealimeanseriously>>> -- 01:46, 5 August 2011 (EDT)


 * I am also going to be absent again, for reasons I don't think I need to explain at this point, but in most of the points I don't have an urgently strong opinion. I agree with Doorsey on number 1, though, I have no clue what that's even about, we ABSOLUTELY need someone to be on top of logging, and I have no idea what azulspeak is, nor was I aware of new irc rules being added willy nilly. -- 02:36, 5 August 2011 (EDT)