KHWiki:Pages for deletion

__NEWSECTIONLINK__ This is the page for listing articles, templates, categories, or other pages to discuss deletion. Voice your opinion on the deletion of these items by adding a bulleted comment and signing your name at the end of your comment with ~. Once a discussion has concluded, an administrator will close the discussion. Discussions may be archived a week after being closed.

In order to keep things moving along on this page, the following rules are in place:

1. Post the article, category, or media to a new section. To add a new heading, click the "+" button at the top of the page or click here. You will be given a box to input a header or topic.

2. In the heading or right under it, place a link to the article or media in question. If we can't find it, we can't delete it! Also, please do not give a URL link, or we won't know it has been deleted afterwords!
 * To list an article, type article title.
 * To list a category type : Category:Name of category. Remember the colon in the beginning or it won't link correctly.
 * To list a template, type to generate a link to the template.

3. Post Keep, Delete, or Merge and a short reason that action should take place. Make sure to add your signature ( ~ ).

4. '''NO talk templates (talk bubbles) may be used on this page. If one is posted, it will be removed'''.

5. Once a final decision is made by the admin, the discussion is closed. Any attempts to reinstate an article require a new discussion first, or the article will be deleted immediately.

For archived discussions, see the Archives.

The Sultan
Come on dude! I was only doing a non-canon reference. You don't have to be that harsh. Here's a link to show proof of what I did. Begin at 8:45 and pause at 8:47 --Metallix-117R 06:56, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Category:Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days rings
Should be Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days Accessories, and we already have that category.
 * It should be rings, since that's what they are in Days, not Accessories. That's why it's hard coded into the infobox template. Glorious  CHAOS!  18:40, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Never mind then. My mistake. In any case, shouldn't the R on rings be capitalized? KingdomKeyDarkside 04:22, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts 3
All speculation, and terribly written at that. has no place here.

File:Vanitas.gif
It was a mistake

The Angry Video Game Nerd Saves Kingdom Hearts!
I'm pretty sure you can guess by the title how this is uneeded. -- J F  H   avoc   01:52, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

This is a real story, just go to FanFiction.Net and look this title up and read it. Trust me you'll love it. I read myself and hoped for a sequel.

I've got nothing against the story or anything like this but fanfiction doesn't have a place on the KHWiki. -- J F  H   avoc   02:00, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Rules are rules, after all. No fan content on the KH-Wiki.-- Ninja Sheik  02:01, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

really angry video-game nerd wow + it could be making fun of the seriesKhruler 02:05, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

tell ya what we will look at it and see if it stays

Uh, dude, it's long since deleted. Maggosh 01:40, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Tetsuya Nomura
This page needs to be deleted on the account of that it's a copy/paste of the article from Wikipedia. So sad... Here's the link: Tetsuya Nomura. - UnknownEnigma 04:30, March 5, 2010 (UTC) Still, he is the creator of the game, so there should be an article about him. Bananaphone1996
 * Deleted. If we decide we want to have a Nomura article, it needs to be our own creation. Glorious  CHAOS!  12:07, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, the consensus has been this (it's on the Manual of Style, anyway) : Where there are articles about real-life people behind the development of Kingdom Hearts, there should be a link to the WP article, rather than an article about him on KHW. Also, if we're going to start an article over here, how would we even write it ? Would we be able to go in-depth ? 04:02, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Tara
Belongs on a fanon wiki, not needed.-- Xion 4  ever  15:05, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

:Category:Game Elements
A user was using this as a sandbox. Please to be deleted. --Neumannz 00:52, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts 3
Does it need an explaination. 01:25, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Deleted. I think since this is the second attempt to recreate the page in so many days, a little protection might be in order as well. 03:20, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Zazu
This article is for a character with no appearance or involvment in any KH game, so, yeah. --Neumannz 07:13, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Anti-Glide
Why are you deleting my Anti-Glide? It is perfectly alright! Isn't it? What's wrong with it?FinalMix+ 04:33, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

he has a point the page is just a stub everybody pokhmon 18:57, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

The information isn't quite enough to warrant a page. It would fit much better as a section on the Anti Form page itself. 01:04, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Hell Blade
A fanon page. Please delete it. Uxie  Lover  1994 15:34, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Kingdomh Hearts II
First off, it's a duplicate page. Second, it's spelled wrong. And third, it's criticizing the game. -- 18:35, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Hidden Boss: Phantom
We already have a boss Phantom article. This is not needed.UnknownEnigma 21:51, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Template:Pokhmon xigbar
Should be added to users main talk template (already is), not needed anymore.-- Xion 4  ever  22:16, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Template:InfoForm
See Template talk:InfoForm. The infobox just needs to be removed from the articles it is currently being used on. -- 03:53, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Duplicate ReCom card images
Please delete the following images:

File:Random_Joker_(card).PNG

File:Bottomless_Darkness_(card).PNG

File:Gold_Card.PNG

File:Roulette_Room_(card).PNG

File:Platinum_Card.PNG

File:Bond_of_Flame_(card).PNG

File:Follow_the_Wind_(card).PNG

File:Monochrome_(card).PNG

File:Hidden_Dragon_(card).PNG

File:Star_Seeker_(card).PNG

File:Soul_Eater_Item_Card_(card).PNG

File:Photon_Debugger_(card).PNG

I created them before knowing how their template works. --ShardofTruth 14:09, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

MP Charge
Nothing but junk by a anonymous. Need of deletion.-- Ninja Sheik  16:43, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Done Ult ima 17:12, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Keyblade Intermediary
I just noticed there wasn't a message to have this page deleted placed here, so I delighted myself in doing it! Please delete this for UE! ^_^UnknownEnigma 00:19, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Please Keep. Why do you want this deleted? I thought a piece on "the mechanics of a keyblade" would be helpful in understanding how they work. Autoninja 00:28, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

I actually think it needs to stay. It is very good information. Keyblade474 00:30, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

It's just a compilement of various weapons we already have pages for. I saw delete. EDIT: Also, certain parts of the article seem speculative, like the bit about not knowing if having to use an "intermediary" is a product of not having a master or not. Plus "Keyblade Intermediary" is a made-up term.-- Lapis of the Night  00:36, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

I nominated this article (also Intermediary, which isn't even an article) because it suggests that temporary replacements for a Keyblade is an actual Keyblade mechanic, which is untrue. There is no real connection between the wooden swords except the fact that they are all wooden swords; the Keyblade of People's Hearts is actually a Keyblade; there is no clear explanation about the transition from Soul Eater and Way to the Dawn; and the stick is a stick. This article pretty much lists a bunch of non-keyblade weapons (plus the Keyblade of People's Hearts) and claimed they're connected by a mechanic called "intermediaries", and they're not. Plus all the valid info here is already in the other articles. So I say Delete. --Neumannz 00:40, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Keeping that page is redundant. Almost all of that information can be found on other articles:


 * Wooden Swords- Wooden Sword
 * Hearts- Keyblade of People's Hearts
 * Sticks- Wooden Stick
 * Struggle Bats- Struggle Bats
 * Soul Eater- Soul Eater

And the "master" article: Weapons

Outside of being redundant- the page doesn't even follow the rules from the MoS, the grammer and punctuation is horrible, some information in the article is speculation/personal opinions.-- Xion 4  ever  00:44, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Well, when you guys put it that way... I say delete. Keyblade474 01:02, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Dark Break
Is the information not enough to warrant a page? I was just following the Wanted Articles section and it was there so I just decided to make it. FinalMix+ 11:32, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

One-Winged Angel Talk Templates
I've merged all his talkbubbles into one template. Please delete:


 * Template:One-Winged Angel2
 * Template:One-Winged AngelDFF
 * Template:One-Winged AngelFur
 * Template:One-Winged AngelG
 * Template:One-Winged AngelGrd
 * Template:One-Winged AngelNob
 * Template:One-Winged AngelTZS
 * Template:One-Winged AngelXig

Thanks!-- Xion 4  ever  22:59, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Unneeded Categories (And category talk)

 * Category:Female characters
 * Category:Female characters


 * Category:Male characters


 * Category talk:Female characters

Thanks! 16:26, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Groudon-Fire
Do I even need to explain it?-- Lapis of the Night  21:39, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

I agree. Delete it. That page has nothing to do with the KH story, it should be deleted... - JTD95 02:43, March 30 , 2010 (UTC)

Dodge Roll LV %u24C1
Kindly delete this, as it is a product of a browser malfunction. --Neumannz 07:08, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

File:KeyBladeM.jpg
I made the picture myself using images from google. please let me know if this is not aloud. KeyBladeM 11:00, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Old BBS Keyblade Images
With the new Ultimania Scans, these are no longer needed:
 * File:Aqua Key.png
 * File:Aqua's Keyblade form.jpg
 * File:Chaos Reaper.jpg
 * File:Chaos Reaper Closeup.png
 * File:Dark Biter.jpg

-- 21:56, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Templete:SoraDragonCalibur
A "template" a user made for a second talk bubble by accident.-- Lapis of the Night  19:39, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Vanitas's Sentiment (Boss)
I don't get it Lingering Sentiment once had only one article that has a boss article later it had a character page? Why delete Vanitas's Sentiment (Boss)? --Cococrash11 21:47, April 9, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11
 * The Lingering Sentiment only had the boss section of its article removed and made into its own article when the Lingering Sentiment page itself had enough content to stand alone. While the Vanitas's Sentiment has the character template on it, it should hardly be classified as such because it lacks an Appearance, Story, and Personality. Please DO NOT attempt to add this in, however. Leave the article be until it appears in a case similar to the Lingering Sentiment. - EternalNothingnessXIII 21:51, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

There's also the fact that the Lingering Sentiment, as of Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep, is not just a boss anymore ike Vanitas's Sentiment is. He is a temporary playable character with a role in the actual story.-- Lapis of the Night  21:59, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Can we please think of changing the infobox used on the page? - EternalNothingnessXIII 22:03, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

I think that we should there is no reason to keep it there it don't have any plot it is just a boss so unless he appears again in other game with a story it must keep only as a boss--Xabryn 23:50, April 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * First of all, there is no article called Vanitas's Sentiment (Boss). Second, Vanitas's Sentiment currently has no character role; it just serves as a boss. Because of this, the article Vanitas's Sentiment is used as if it were a boss article, though there is no need to add "(Boss)" to the end of the article's title since there is no respective character article for Vanitas's Sentiment. If Vanitas's Sentiment makes an appearance in a later game as a character, then an article covering its character will likely be created. -- 23:57, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Kingdom hearts:future worlds
Is there anything I have to say on this...? -- 02:03, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts Headquarters
The "Groudon-Fire" vandal again.-- Lapis of the Night  21:53, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

Saix
Someone created a new Saix page. Mind deleting it?
 * Too late! Made it a redirect instead. --Neumannz 01:41, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Copycat
This should either be merged with Darkside or deleted, as it is not very useful or well written. Keyblade474 22:15, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Template:Organization XIII Full
There's no reason for this; take it to the Fanon wiki, not here. Not that it's worth mentioning, but he didn't even bother to fix any of the information so it fits the table; For example, Ulquiorra's Attribute is "Left pectoral muscle", and Grimmjow's original name is "Shawlong Kūfang, Edrad Liones, Yylfordt Granz, Di Roy Linker and Nakeem Greendina". Maggosh 13:47, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

Card:Main page
This page as a deletion template but is not listed here. Do as you see fit. UnknownEnigma 16:44, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Kingdom hearts 3
No explanation needed. Maggosh 01:03, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Remakes and Other Titles
If'n you please. --Neumannz 20:24, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirected to Kingdom Hearts, to fix the link in the side-bar. Thanks for the notice! -- 22:07, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

What I think Kingdom hearts 3 the Keyblade wars would be like.
Fanon/speculation.-- Lapis of the Night  01:06, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Deleted -- 01:42, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Horizontal Slash
That page shouldn't be deleted. It is an actual Kingdom Hearts II ability that has not been explained on any other article. FinalMix+ 06:01, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Same here this page needs to stay. SoraDragonCalibur
 * By right the Kingdom Hearts II abilities page or even Sora's ability page should explain it all ; this page would be nothing but a stub. If there are sufficient acquisition details PLUS an image PLUS the levels in which it is acquired, then yes, we can keep it. So, two options : make this page better or let it head straight to oblivion. 13:40, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

XionXIV
If you would be so kind. --Neumannz 20:34, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it seriously needs to be deleted.--Kingdom zachdawg 21:09, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Crown Stickers
This article is completely useless, as the only the fact we know is that they exist. Unless someone can get some real info, this article should cease its existence- entirely. The Inexistent 23:21, April 26, 2010 (UTC)The Inexistent
 * Wow, that's an overreaction. Given all the other stubs on this site, there's no reason not to leave it alone until we have more information. --Neumannz 23:36, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's why we have the "stub" category to begin with. We should always try and improve articles before deleting them, and the fact that we know the Crown Stickers will appear means we'll have more information eventually.-- Lapis of the Night  23:42, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm all for keeping it, as long as someone can add in more info on the Crown Stickers. 01:25, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's just the problem, Troisnyxetienne; there is no more information on "Crown Stickers". All we know is they are going to be in the North American version of Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep. We don't know if they are an in-game item, or a physical sticker that comes with the game. Until we get more information, we might as well keep it. -- 03:15, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * True... I'm all for the keeping, even if in a worst-case scenario BBS gets released in August or early September. But I still think The Inexistent's remark was overdone. 03:47, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Lock-On
I did this early cause I had a feeling it would show up. I took a lot of work into making that article. The reason why I did it is beacause I felt that this wiki is lacking the smaller details(like that Chaining article). FinalMix+ 07:00, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, since it's a function and there are differences AND descriptions (including the one in the KH awakening), then I believe it should stay, but be expanded. And images must be added too. 07:05, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * With respect, may I have some opinions on this page as a replacement? It still lacks images, and I'm not sure about official descriptions, but I think it's mostly accurate, plus it incorporates related abilities. --Neumannz 07:08, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Also, why the devil are you putting it here? Are you even nominating it for deletion? --Neumannz 07:09, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed ; I thought someone had actually put this bit up. 09:33, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

I think it should be kept because we can expand it to have more info. Anyone who has the exact definitions are welcome to put them up and I'm sure we have some images of enemies "locked on" to. It is an important function that is featured in every game (maybe except coded... I haven't played it so I have no idea) and it's also very important for the Shoot Lock ability in BBS which can be talked about. - 14:44, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

M
Hey, an unregitered user created an article entitled "M". I, of course, can't delete it. The Inexistent 18:03, April 27, 2010 (UTC)The_Inexistent

Riku dark
Do I even need to explain it? Maggosh 13:48, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * It has been done. - 17:08, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Irc.wikia.com/gaming/oh, how the sea calls
Same reason as above. maggosh 04:04, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Done! - 04:37, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Help and Information
An unregistered user made a page named "Help and Information". It shouldn't be there (look at it and you'll see why). http://kingdomhearts.wikia.com/wiki/Help_and_Information The Inexistent 16:45, May 2, 2010 (UTC)The_Inexistent
 * Redirected to Kingdom Hearts Wiki:Traverse Town. Seemed like a fitting place for help and information. -- 20:46, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts: Wielders of the Key
Article apparently about a new KH game, no source, virtually no information ecept for a seemingly fan-made logo.-- Lapis of the Night  18:09, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, please delete the fan-made logo "File:Kingdom hearts- wielders of the key.png". Thanks!-- Xion 4  ever  18:15, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Fake, since it was me who made it :P u can delete it
 * Deleted. Be sure to check the site-notice before creating fake or fanon articles. -- 20:48, May 2, 2010 (UTC)