Talk:Xigbar

Category
I do believe that Xigbar and the other members should go under Characters and Enemies. I mean, that's what they are. Human Characters is blatant, at the least; because then that opens up unneeded possibilities, such as Disney Characters. And with most of the characters being from Disney, there isn't much point there. As for enemies... Well, that's what they are. I know for somethings the Parent Category is bad. But for others it makes sense; if somebody is just browsing, I doubt they'd go to each sub-category. They'd just want to see who the enemies are, boss or no. I do hope I'm making sense; this is REALLY hard for me to explain. I have lost track of where it was taught to me, but...yeah. I'm for the Characters and Enemies categories (though I guess you could already tell that, 'cause I'm the one who slipped them in there). Woo.--Dreyfus 04:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, they should go for the subcategories if they're browsing, since they're the first on the category pages, before the entries. If they're looking for someone particular, they'll be easily categorized there, and if they're just browsing, the subcategory tree is actually designed for that in the Mediawiki software.  I'm not opposed to doing things differently for its own sake, but organizations with far more wiki experience than us do it this way across a large variety of wikis.
 * Also, I was planning on making a Category:Disney Characters :(. It doesn't seem like any "child" categories would be a bad idea unless they had too few members, not too many.
 * And if these categories are included, they need to go in, not simply on this page, so they are included in all the Organization members' pages. Still though, redundant categories in my opinion just lead to categories being less useful IMO (see my reply at DELETE, on a similar subject.)  Scott ch 04:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Xigbar vs Ven (Xion)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZwk5zc71yg

one thing that bothered me about that: Xigbar got distracted upon seeing Xion as Ven, but his reaction to roxas' uncanny resemblance to Ven is not stated anywhere. (or maybe i just haven't encountered it -.-)--121.54.92.102 09:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Could someone tell me what he said at that moment, or in what day does it happen?

er, day 354, i think.

Nickname
That was rather surprising.--天下 無双 ！！  19:37, September 26, 2009 (UTC)

Days Fight
I was just wondering if we should make a small mention on the Xigbar enemy page about the battle in Days at the Coliseum ? i realise its a trivial battle and not that important but i do feel it sould atleast have a little mention/strategy. What do you people think ? Ximodnic 01:07, October 25, 2009 (UTC)

"Ill Will"?
Something in the Personality section's bugging me. The idea that there's ill will between Xigbar and Xemnas and Saix seems like a bit of a stretch, as it's been shown that the numerical ranks aren't related to authority, which begs the question of why mention of Xigbar's rank is even in the Personality section. I'm going to make changes accoringly.LapisScarab 23:43, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

That's fine with me.-- Ninja Sheik  23:47, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

It's actually FINE. Read the reasoning in the history. Xigbar's comedic, carefree nature is something viewed as "un-Nobody", especially for a Senior Member, and it's annoying to Xemnas and Saix, who take their ADMINISTRATIVE jobs seriously, and don't bother with the easier field missions that Xigbar takes. Both of these are PERSONALITY referances. Simply make the writing clearer. Don't erase it. - EternalNothingnessXIII 23:52, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

How about if just the "Some have wondered" sentence is removed? That's really what's bugging me the most. It's just too speculative. We have no way of knowing if that is the reason Xigbar isn't given a lot of authority. But you're right about the rest of the section and after looking it over, it does fit. LapisScarab 04:13, November 19, 2009 (UTC)


 * Exactly. REMOVE all speculation. - EternalNothingnessXIII 09:12, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

First Appearance
Shouldn't Xigbar's first chronological appearance be in KHII Final Mix? Since he mentions looking for new recruits, and all 13 members are present in KH Days, then that surely comes before.

Samoth 13:41, January 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * That is not at all how that entry works. Glorious  CHAOS!  19:02, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

Resemblance
Ok, I was looking through my Kingdom Heaets 358/2 Days strategy guide when I noticed something. With the pointy ears, yellow eyes, doesn't Xigbar seem to resemble Master Xehanort?IS that worth noting? Vaddie 16:49, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, but in titles after BBS he's aged and seems to look like Master Xehanort. Nomura even noted the resemblance in a recent interview. http://forums.khinsider.com/spoilers/147009-bbs-ultimania-plot-mysteries-nomura-interview.html Vaddie 17:00, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

In the article
It says something about drowning a goldfish, what does that mean? Isn't that sorta impossible? (Bananaphone1996 23:00, June 18, 2010 (UTC))

KH2 Ven/Roxas Reference
Why not both?204.211.185.107 16:17, October 20, 2010 (UTC)

Xigbar is a very deceitful individual. In his Secret Reports, he directly compares Roxas' face with Ven's and when he faces Xion asks why Ven 'always' looks at him like that, despite how he only actually met him once. It seems certain, to me at least, that "The look", is something that all four of them share when they encounter him. Some of the expressions on Roxas' face during some of the cutscenes in Days would lend credence to this, as well as the fact that I remember a statement on Nomura's part at the time of KH2's release that Xigbar meant Roxas.76.4.6.157 23:33, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

2012 Special Trailer
Why would we assume that is not Braig?192.249.47.177 20:52, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, "and compares Sora's glare to Ventus's again." sounds pretty weak.192.249.47.177 22:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)