Talk:Kingdom of Corona

History question: does anyone know where the name "Corona" is from? (I know the intended meaning/symbolism behind it, that's not what I meant.) The Disney Wiki has been calling it that since at least January 2011, but I assume it's from supplemental material (say, a guidebook or the official screenplay), because I don't recall hearing it in the actual movie. Ultima Spark  (talk)   12:46, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That's actually a good question! Both the Disney Wiki and the Wikipedia have it unsourced, and you're right, the kingdom's name was never stated in the film. Perhaps maybe in a movie guidebook or one of the children's books? Still, the official KH Twitter is the only legit source that comes up that confirms the name.-- 20:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Should this go in the article somewhere? Or should we wait until the game's release/more information? 05:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * You mean about where the name came from?-- 01:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * How exactly was the name given, again? There's no concrete evidence this is the world name. It is, however, the name of the location (apparently?) where the film takes place, which just so happens to be within this new world. Look at La Cité des Cloches: just because it contains Notre Dame, it isn't called that…It's possible that Disney merely was referring to the setting itself, and not actually revealing the world's name… - 02:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That may be true, but "Kingdom of Corona" is how they described on the official Twitter and it's better than simply labeling it as Tangled's world.-- 04:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Right, but we don't want to spread false info, either. While it says this on the Twitter page, we don't know that this is the world's name with absolute certainty, yet. I personally think it's too early to have KH3 articles on the Wiki…Nothing but the game itself has been set in stone yet. - 04:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That's why we have the template. Given the fact that the only source of the name is from the Twitter, it is likely. Lots of things are cut out and changed during development, but I don't think they would just call it that for the heck of it if they weren't sure. Even if they did, it's nothing to sweat over since it's now labeled as a working name.-- 19:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Right. I'm not trying to be difficult. I just thought we didn't allow articles for things with "working" titles/names…specifically because they are prone to change. - 21:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It's okay. When the tweet came out, a lot of articles and websites also came the same conclusion. Again, I don't think they would carelessly call it that if it wasn't a confirmed name, since no one apparently knows where the name even came from.-- 04:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)