Talk:Twilight Thorn


 * Nope, looks good to me. Thanks for catching this. ^_^ BebopKate 05:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

🇲🇦

🇲🇦

🇲🇦

🇲🇦

🇲🇦

🇲🇦

Actually that name was was once mentioned on the website khinsider, and was used to refer to the nobody dusk, not twilight thorn. I think it was just a fan name made to be able to easily refer to that specific nobody instead of just calling it "that tight suit white skinny thing that moves in the air like a fish".

🇲🇦


 * Honestly, we don't have any proof that it even exists. I mean, Darksides have shown up outside of Dive into the Heart, but we can't say the same about the Twilight Thorn.—Urutapu 18:41, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

I don't think it is a low-ranking Nobody. Obviously not as high as Organization XIII, but not below dusks and samurai. It's probably just in the middle. Of course I don't have proof for that, I'm just assuming.--Xsonicdragon 22:39, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
 * All of the high-ranking Nobodies say "this is a high-ranking Nobody" in their journal entry, and are associated with an Organization member. That's why they're high-ranking (it's not about power, it's about military hierarchy). Twilight Thorn does not list that it is high-ranking, just like the Creeper and Dusk don't, which doesn't mean it's not powerful - just that it's subservient to all members instead of just one. Glorious  CHAOS!  07:07, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

Picture
GS undefined

Gallery picture + video coding went awry

 * The videos fixed, though it should be replaced with a youtube version so that it is centered correctly. No idea what's wrong with the image, maybe it got deleted. Glorious  CHAOS!  15:20, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank youuuu ^_^ I reckon that the one in the Gallery was the official artwork, what else could've been put in there ? 15:31, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

Guardian
Xena Organization OC: Well it seems logical that TT wants Roxas back.

That sounds exactly like the story behind the Eidolons in FFXIII, no?Axel&#39;s Sentiment 06:03, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

the Eidolons in FF13 serve as protectors of the party members. they are the physical embodiment of their will and emotions. an Eidolon appears before their human when they are in a sad, almost suicidal state of mind, then casts doom on them to get them to fight for their life. after fighting their Eidolon, and beating it in battle, the doom spell is removed as their human has regained their will to fight and live another day. from that point they serv as the players summon, each character only getting one summon.

another interesting thing about Eidolons in 13, each playable character, accept Hope, their Eidolon is the opposite gender than they are. Ixbran 09:00, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hence accentuating the suggestiveness a bit more.


 * Now, I wouldn't say TT is an Eidolon, but it's more like a lesser Nobody being called upon by OXIII to serve the purpose of bringing Roxas back. And since the Awakening is something which takes place within a heart, we might be able to assume that 1) Roxas has a heart, 2) it's a test of Roxas' willpower. 11:32, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

i don't think that SE was trying to go for suggestive Themes when giving the summons their genders. i think its supposed to support the fact that a persons Eidolon is meant to be a Life Partner. sort of like a marriage, but only for the sake of combat, and NOT romantic reason. The Eidolon protecting their human.

i think the only reason the character, Hope, is cut form this is because hes only 14, too young to be given a Guardian to represent a Life Partner. so he is given a summon that acts more like a Fatherly Protector, than a Life Partner Protector. but that's just my theory on the whole thing. Ixbran 22:17, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I was saying suggestiveness after seeing Snows Eidolon. I seem to be okay with Vanille's and the like, and even Lightning's Eidolon seems reasonable. But Snow Viliers has taken suggestiveness to plain obvious, blatant, profanity splayed out for all the world to see.' Well, what would we expect ?  01:59, July 18, 2010 (UTC)