User talk:Saxisai/Archive2

Talk Bubble Delivery
To use it type the following code:

Put what you want to say in between "text=" and the ending brackets.

Happens every time
{{JFHavoc|time=06:52, December 30, 2009 (UTC)|text=I'm glad you figured out how to do so much with your talk bubble. (Nice picture by the way). As for the 4 extra "}" things, I don't know what to tell you. It's happened to me countless times. Sometimes even when I made talk bubbles for other people. I have no idea what causes it. If you want to fix it try asking DTN or Xiggie. They know quite a bit more about talk bubbles than I do and they should be able to fix it.}}
 * All fixed. -- 07:13, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

"Vanitas's" X-blade?
I know that Vanitas uses the X-blade, but can we really actually say it belongs to him? I mean, the way it's presented as a major plot point and the way everyone talks about it, it seems pretty unique. It should probably be in its own article, and mention how Vanitas wielded it. Immblueversion (talk) 23:59, January 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * You say that it should be called "Vanitas's X-blade" just because Vanitas is the only known person to use it. In that case, we'd might as well change "Keyblade of People's Hearts" into "Riku's Keyblade of People's Hearts" or "Xehanort's Keyblade of People's Hearts." Unless you consider that to be invalid taking how Sora used it for about ten seconds into account.


 * Here's how I see it: the reason all the other Keyblades we don't know the names of such as Master Xehanort's Keyblade, Vanitas's Keyblade, and Eraqus's Keyblade were given such titles in the articles is because they are all different Keyblades, and we know for a fact that there are more than one Keyblades, but that those individual Keyblades are theirs. The X-blade, on the other hand, is not any normal Keyblade. It is a unique weapon, and making Vanitas's ownership of it so overly-apparent in the article title denies the subject that feature. Now, if there were to be a second X-blade and that were to fall into the possession of another person who is not Vanitas, then that's when this one X-blade should be distinguished as Vanitas's.


 * If this argument doesn't work and you remain intent on keeping it "Vanitas's X-blade", then you acknowledge it as at least being an X-blade (or "a", since I'm not sure exactly how it should be pronounced in English), so there should at least be an article for the "X-blade" in general.


 * I don't want to make a big fuss over this, which is why I haven't touched the article. Immblueversion (talk) 01:37, January 10, 2010 (UTC)