Form talk:Sora

Would
Would this change via Ansem's Computer count as Sora's clothes or Donald's magic causing the change? - EternalNothingnessXIII 16:12, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * It's Ansem's computer. Because if it's Sora's clothes, then it wouldn't be possible for Donald and Goofy to change either.  TNÉ  Pour Noël je te donnerai le battement de mon cœur… ♥ 16:25, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, technically, it's ENCOM's digitization beam, but hey...

And it can't be Sora's clothes. Anyone who's digitized gains a similar appearance in Tron. Maggosh 16:28, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

Data Forms
Wouldn't it be better to merge all the Data forms in one page. I really don't see any reasons for Sora, Donald and Goofy to have each their Data page when they all can be covered in one. - 46.46.195.224 19:21, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * As it is the case with the Retro form and if we call the others Halloween Form, Christmas Town Form, Atlantica Form and Pride Lands Form we could merge them too. I think they don't have a single page because the galleries would get out of hand and it's convenient to split the character articles. We also might get official names for them too someday. --ShardofTruth 23:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The Atlantica and Pride Lands forms should stay separate, as they have completely unique mechanics, but the other stuff could probably be merged into their character pages. It's basically nothing more than a reskin. 07:32, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * In gameplay stats, they are. But I can recall Sora checking out his armor after coming to during the first visit. Heck, in KH1, Donald even mentions that they now look spooky. Uxie   Lover   1994  07:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, but that's story info. The walkthroughs have a lot of stuff to cover, and we don't really need an infobox to cover stuff that's purely story or visual. 09:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

If we're going to give Sora, Donald and Goofy each their own form page, then why has Riku been listed on this page, while Donald and Goofy is not? - 91.135.33.252 14:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm honestly not sure why we even have these things, excluding the Atlantica and Pride Lands forms. None of the names are actually canon, as far as I know.192.249.47.195 16:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Deletion?

 * You know, I was thinking along the lines of the same thing myself. Why is there a page for each form of each character when each character page has its own "forms" section??? Let's get rid of the damn things then. I just feel like kicking myself now for creating that "Data Riku" page. EnglishJoker 21:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd like to move for a Forms: namespace, add it to the suite template and dump the forms for each character in there. I consider it the ideal liminality between articles for each form and putting the forms into the character's article. maggosh 21:12, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * If we wanted to have like Game:Sora/Forms, and include all costumes etc., sure. 05:23, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Lion, Card, Die
I believe the Bradygames gives names and stats for these forms. Should they be split off? 06:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think so since I would like the Form: articles to not be limited to just describe appearances. They are articles dedicated to Forms so they should cover everything about Forms. I was thinking about just adding any gameplay changes that a form may have, as small paragraphs in the section dedicated to that form. However this probably won't work with the drive forms but you could write about how it looks when you attack instead. As for stats, you could make an info box like enemies perhaps? 12:25, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The Lion, Card, and Die forms don't just have small gameplay changes; they have stat and ability changes as well, just like the Drive Forms. Plus, we have official names for them. 02:31, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * It's a tough choice, because we really wanted these Form pages to be comprehensive coverage of all a character's various forms, but at the same time the forms you mention certainly have enough information to merit a separate article... The current formatting for this article wouldn't really lend itself well to infoboxes scattered about for some forms... I guess I'm in favor of separate pages, unless we can reformat the article so it might flow better. 02:41, 3 December 2012 (UTC)