User talk:EternalNothingnessXIII

How to Categorize?
Can you tell me? Printing out wiki style pages

Grekox (talk) 17:35, 8 August 2012 (UTC) (Forgot about them last time D:)

Okay is this good? http://www.khwiki.net/File:Water_Barrel.PNG Grekox (talk) 23:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Images
...you do realize that I can't move every image and correct every link in the same edit, right?

Can you make up your mind as to what you're going to yell at me for not having done while I'm in the middle of doing it? 14:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Mature, Kryten. When a half-hour goes by between your moving an image six times and not fixing the articles, what am I supposed to think? - 14:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * ...that I'm fixing the page that they all go onto first? You know, the one you commented on?
 * I do have a job that I need to be doing, and just because I post a maintenance template doesn't mean I'm specifically telling you to do it; they're usually reminders for me. Seriously, chill out. 14:44, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd take your own advice. If I were seriously yelling at you, then I'd be using all caps. It's more like my thought process/reaction because I really don't get you. Don't take it personally. - 14:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Review
Could you please pull your review notes into something like a structured review form? -- 18:10, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry? Not quite sure what you're asking. - 18:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm trying to get the Review Points into a review article. While I can do maggosh's easily enough, you have a ton of bullets points, in no particular order. It would be a big help if you could pull your points into an article, so that I don't have to worry about losing any of the points you try to make. -- 18:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

IRC
I wasn't replying because I had to go break my fast. If you want to talk, you can come on now since I'm back online. 15:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm on the FF Wiki IRC right now, but could we talk later, perhaps? - 16:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Friend Cure

 * 1) My original position was that captions weren't needed for most of these. I am trying to clean up a frankly ridiculous situation caused by certain editors (who shall remain nameless) insisting on captions that are totally redundant, and other editors (who shall remain nameless) insisting on fighting over whether periods should be in them instead of just using a grammatical sentence in the first place. Meanwhile, I have my own work to get done, so I am fixing these sentences to the bare modicum of grammatical accuracy while trying to get back to my mounting todo list, both wiki-wise and real-life-wise. I usually do these edits while at work, where I do not have access to the game and usually can't even see the image, so I have no resources to make a relevant, useful caption; for that I apologize, but it's also totally unfair for me to keep being told that I am being lazy or being criticized when I haven't done enough in taking time out of my busy schedule to clean up the messes other editors are making.
 * 2) I left your caption alone, it's a good one. The nonsense I was referring to was the bordering on trollish "looking to cause conflict" controversy about periods. As I've said before, this whole mess could be avoided by removing the captions altogether, or just making small and easy changes so that the captions are grammatical sentences that would naturally use a period.
 * 3) The format for ability articles is to describe the effect of the ability in the lead, as per the consensus of the editors who were active at the time.
 * 4) In Olympus Coliseum, all commands used are converted into "compiled commands" unique to that world. Friend Cure (possibly Group Cure, I would need to check the game) is the compiled command that maps to curative commands.192.249.47.177 14:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

IRC
You've been repeatedly joining and immediately leaving the IRC channel. There have been multiple complaints about this behavior, which I believe you have been informed of, and it is also against the wiki policies; per the staff page, staff are supposed to make themselves available on the IRC as long as they are active so that other editors and readers can ask them for support with the wiki. As a more compelling but less day-to-day example, difficulty in getting a hold of other admins nearly prevented the Square Enix trip from happening, and may have crippled our relationship with the SE rep due to our inability to get the reviews and release activities done in time.

In summary, it's vital that the non-resigned staff be available on the IRC if they have the ability to be, even if they are just lurking the channel. 03:31, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I do that for my own reasons. No where do I see it plainly stated in black and white that "staff members must be on the IRC at all times". - 03:41, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * As I said, "per the staff page". I included a link, too.
 * Also, one of the larger issues is that there have been multiple complaints. Even if it wasn't plainly stated, consensus policy, the fact that the community is unhappy with it would be reason enough to make it policy. As I said before, our staff's cavalier attitude about being available for support nearly did and still may have sabotaged our relationship with SE, and is currently sabotaging our relationship with our own community. 04:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)