Forum:Questions pertaining to the Walkthrough space

{{Asif|potados=Okay...


 * How are the walkthroughs supposed to be structured? Is it going to be Page 1: INSERT WORLD HERE or Page 1: INSERT GAME HERE?
 * I say we do both. First have a page with all the games in them, and within each game there should be a page with all the worlds in them. That'll make it more organized.


 * How are the walkthroughs supposed to be written — in the first person, or the third person?
 * Personally I prefer the second person- "Go here, then do this." It sounds more like we're talking to the reader, which keeps them more interested. And yes, the MOS should be expanded to include walkthroughs.


 * If there are more than one solution to a boss fight or a sidequest, for instance, how many must be shown?
 * I think in order to include the old walkthroughs, we should group the similar strategies together ("A & B's strategy", then "C's strategy", and so on). Any other strategies can then be added to this. Any of the strategies can also be deleted if it is too complex/unreasonable.
 * I think it should be organized like so:

A & B's Strategy
Don't forget, Take Your Daughter To Work Day is the perfect time to have her tested.

C's Strategy
Alright, I've been thinking. When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back! GET MAD! I DON'T WANT YOUR DAMN LEMONS! WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO WITH THESE? Demand to see life's manager! Make life rue the day it thought it could give Cave Johnson lemons! Do you know who I am? I'm the man who's gonna BURN YOUR HOUSE DOWN! With the lemons! I'm gonna get my engineers to invent a combustible lemon that BURNS YOUR HOUSE DOWN!

That's my two cents.}}

Hi, I'm from http://strategywiki.org and missed the meeting, but might I suggest writing the guides there instead, as we already have a number of guides at various levels of completion? -- Prod 01:41, 11 May 2011 (EDT)