Editing Forum:Archiving policy

{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}}

<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ -->
{{Sove|time=19:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)|saixtalk=[[User talk:Soraxroxas]]

This is getting ridiculous. He is now going to archive messages the second he reads them and we don't have any rule against doing that. I propose that only messages older than x amount of time may be arhived. Archives already make it harder when you want to search something from someone's talk page, so archiving should have limits.

I also propose that warnings may only be archived after one year has passed since the '''most recent''' warning, after which they can be archived and considered expired. Not only this allows a user who rarely gets warnings to have the warnings eventually expired, it also makes tracking warnings much less bothersome, when we don't need to check the user's archives for any previous warnings.

And let the discussion begin!}}
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Forumheader|The Realm of Sleep|The World that Never was}}
+{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}}
 <!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ -->
 {{Sove|time=19:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)|saixtalk=[[User talk:Soraxroxas]]
-This is getting ridiculous. He is now going to archive messages the second he reads them and we don't have any rule against doing that. I propose that only messages older than x amount of time may be archived. Archives already make it harder when you want to search something from someone's talk page, so archiving should have limits.
+This is getting ridiculous. He is now going to archive messages the second he reads them and we don't have any rule against doing that. I propose that only messages older than x amount of time may be arhived. Archives already make it harder when you want to search something from someone's talk page, so archiving should have limits.
 I also propose that warnings may only be archived after one year has passed since the '''most recent''' warning, after which they can be archived and considered expired. Not only this allows a user who rarely gets warnings to have the warnings eventually expired, it also makes tracking warnings much less bothersome, when we don't need to check the user's archives for any previous warnings.
 And let the discussion begin!}}
-:6 months minimum. That's my policy on my own archive. {{User:Erry/Sig}} 19:57, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
-{{Uxie|time=20:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)|text=I archive my messages after at least two weeks, though some have lasted about a month. I recomend at least a month.}}
-{{ShardofTruth|time=20:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)|talk=I archive after the page passed the hundredth message, navigation becomes unbearable after this point. This being said this is [[User talk:DisneyGirkeybladewielder95|not the first case]] of instantly message archieving but I think these cases will be rare and are not worth our time.}}
-{{KrytenKoro|emotion=sad|I'm not sure this needs to be an issue. Whether or not she pretends that they don't exist, the warnings are still active. If we need to make a rule that warnings cannot be archived, only expunged, we can, but it might be simpler to just keep an archive on the heartless manufactory so that we don't have to be constantly watching user talk pages in order to keep track of who is being a little shit.}}