Talk:Yuna, Rikku, and Paine

"More Gracious" Comment

I've pulled the "more gracious" comment from the entry's text and request that you please not re-add it. That's a personal opinion that does not belong in an encyclopedia entry. In addition, implying that that showing skin is tasteless treads very close to slut shaming on the list of "Things You Do Not Do If You Don't Want To Be Blatantly Misogynist."

69.19.14.26 16:33, June 20, 2010 (UTC) Swinburne

---

FFwiki users, do you think CSM would have liked them a little bit more if they were dressed like this in FFX-2? just joking =D Pablo618 21:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't know, but they need to be more detailed in the other games. We don't even know what they really are... --Unbirth 21:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh snap, we don't even know who they really are ! What next ? -.- Oh well, to be honest, I prefer their Kingdom Hearts II outfits - they're much more gracious. I'd call their FFX-2 outfits "unwanted exposure". Helping others always comes before asking others for help. • TroisNyxÉtienne

That's nice for you, darlin' (and I'm sorry, I'm a total guest here), but I've pulled the "more gracious" comment from the entry's text. The amount of skin you believe women should or should not show is nobody's business but your own, and some readers may resent the idea that showing skin is tasteless. 69.19.14.26 16:28, June 20, 2010 (UTC) Swinburne

Mind you, I'm putting it back. Because it's not being subjective, keep in mind that Kingdom Hearts is a game for minors and up. You won't wanna be showing flesh to them, even if you think it's okay. TROISNYX AMDG 01:11, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

EDIT 01:13, June 21, 2010 (UTC) : Well, at least you didn't remove that bit. But the wiki stance remains : be gracious. And about it being nobody's business but our own, hello, there's such a thing as moral police on this wiki, so watch your words. TROISNYX AMDG

"More gracious" is a loaded value judgment -- and value judgments are subjective. The word "gracious" itself is subjective, which makes it inexact and inappropriate for a wiki entry. A more precise way of expressing that idea would be the changes I made, which I tried to keep straight to the facts (the Gullwing fairies show less skin than the Final Fantasy X-2 Gullwings) without throwing in any sort of value judgment.

69.19.14.26 01:58, June 21, 2010 (UTC) Swinburne

Fair enough, but graciousness is indeed the reason Nomura remodelled Aqua for it to be E10+. If I were you, I wouldn't change it. I'm leaving the content as it is for now, because the facts are still there. But keep what I said in mind. TROISNYX AMDG 02:19, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Character Box?

Does they need a character box? In case my question gets to vague, you know, the Golden-info box.--N/A

Yeah they do. Need a bit of tweaking tho. [^_^]/ 15:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll do it -Azul 21:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

The Name Game

BebopKate - This one is Zazzles...because he's Zazzy! TALK - Here's your cat...and here's your $20...{{{time}}} You know, it's interesting...I keep seeing one of the reasons Rikku was replaced with Yuffie in the first game is her name and the "confusion" it would create with Riku. That really wouldn't have been an issue in Japan; her name over there is リュック, or Ryukku in romanji. They'd sound different enough, I'd think. I'm more in the camp that thinks they wanted to limit her exposure (no pun intended ^_^) when Final Fantasy X-2 was in development. Thoughts?

Maybe so, but couldn't they have just put "Final Fantasy X" in her journal entry ? And by the way, the i sound in Riku is longer than the i sound in Rikku. Helping others always comes before asking others for help. • TroisNyxÉtienne