306
edits
Forum:Our Credibility (Or Lack Thereof): Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Trig Jegman (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}} | {{Forumheader|The Realm of Sleep|The World that Never was}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
{{17m|text= That might be true, but, do we really know how much people visited our Wiki? Who knows, maybe the number of visitors might decrease. Or, we might even barely have any visitors at all. I mean, finding anons or new users in the Recent Changes can be pretty here :/ Of course, not that I'm implying anything here, but it's just... y'know... It worries me a bit. }} | {{17m|text= That might be true, but, do we really know how much people visited our Wiki? Who knows, maybe the number of visitors might decrease. Or, we might even barely have any visitors at all. I mean, finding anons or new users in the Recent Changes can be pretty here :/ Of course, not that I'm implying anything here, but it's just... y'know... It worries me a bit. }} | ||
{{KrytenKoro|emotion= | {{KrytenKoro|emotion=hungry|The enemy gallery headers are certainly a more visible form of categorization, but categorization they still are. Though, with the existing way we cover them, including "Crank Tower", "The Experiment", and "Hostile Program"...I think we have an easy out. | ||
Name those sections "Other". Honestly, we have not confirmed whether all of them (specifically those stated above) are truly entelechies, and "Other" is both non-committal, and a neat pun on one of the term's used for a non-Nobody. | Name those sections "Other". Honestly, we have not confirmed whether all of them (specifically those stated above) are truly entelechies, and "Other" is both non-committal, and a neat pun on one of the term's used for a non-Nobody. | ||
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
{{LightRoxas|riku=I fixed the issue of where Sora got his keyblade (on Sora's article, at least. It might be elsewhere).}} | {{LightRoxas|riku=I fixed the issue of where Sora got his keyblade (on Sora's article, at least. It might be elsewhere).}} | ||
{{KrytenKoro|Aqua didn't perform the ceremony, to my memory. I'm pretty sure Ventus made him a wielder, while Riku gave him the Keyblade.}} | {{KrytenKoro|Aqua didn't perform the ceremony, to my memory. I'm pretty sure Ventus made him a wielder, while Riku gave him the Keyblade.}} | ||
{{Asif|sho=I though Ven only made him a dual-wielder and that his heart was naturally as Keyblade-worthy as Riku's.}} | |||
{{neumannz|time=03:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC)|text=Contact with Ven's heart made him a Keyblade wielder; having Ven's heart rest within him makes him a dual-wielder. | |||
"Other" would be highly satisfactory for enemy galleries and such; after all, that symbol that we use for "Somebodies" is the Ultimania's symbol for "Other". If we need an alternative category name, maybe "Unaffiliated character" or just "Unaffiliated" or something similar? After all, what we call "Somebodies" are just characters that don't fall into the major groups of Heartless, Nobodies, Unversed, and Dream Eaters.}} | |||
{{LightRoxas|text=My bad, I got confused between Kairi and Sora. It is my understanding that Ventus is the complete reason he can wield any keyblade, including dual-wielding. <small><small>dang noobishness...</small></small>}} | |||
{{ShardofTruth|time=19:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC)|talk=This is not completely true as explained [[Talk:Bequeathing#Ven is not the reason Sora can use the keyblade.|here]] by [[Special:Contributions/24.7.239.218|24.7.239.218]].}} | |||
{{TNE|time=22:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC)|blahtext=So they're picking on us on all that ''and the spoiler policy''? Seriously.......? | |||
I could facepalm at their general direction. | |||
Inasmuch as we have gotten some things out of canon/outside the universe, I've checked Traverse Town and there are quite a number of articles which have a tag slapped on it saying that story has to be in-universe. <big>Can't. they. even. SEE. that. blatantly. massive. tag.</big> Not that I'm trying to defend us - where we are wrong, we are wrong, but where we have actually ''1) made a spoiler policy page so that it'd be visible to others, 2) slapped tags calling users to iron out what's wrong'', really now, there's no cause for them to complain.}} | |||