Talk:Attractions: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:If we have enough to cobble together an article, then let's go for it. I think we do anyway, not sure about what the rest think. Otherwise, delete altogether. '''[[User:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#222222">TRS</font>]][[User talk:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#444444">NX</font>]]''' 20:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC) | :If we have enough to cobble together an article, then let's go for it. I think we do anyway, not sure about what the rest think. Otherwise, delete altogether. '''[[User:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#222222">TRS</font>]][[User talk:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#444444">NX</font>]]''' 20:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
::We certainly have more about Attraction Flow to make a rough article than we do the so-called "Kingdom of Corona." - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 21:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC) | ::We certainly have more about Attraction Flow to make a rough article than we do the so-called "Kingdom of Corona." - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 21:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::Yes, this article contains so much more content than Kingdom of Corona. But seriously, I think it would be a better idea to create articles about new KH3 features in userspace first, and move it to mainspace when it has enough information, like how a lot of other wiki's do it. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 11:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:29, 19 August 2015
Seriously Byz, don't. This will need its own page in due course, and there's no point making a redirect for it now. TRSNX 15:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- A redirect is fine for now and besides someone else has made a redirect for Rapunzel so i don't see how this is any different. Byzantinefire - There are no strings on me
(talk) 15:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
I don't know why this had to be done in the first place for Rapunzel; we never did this for when Jaq was announced for Birth by Sleep. The page was erased immediately. TRSNX 15:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Rapunzel was probably made into a redirect (temporarily) because we have no information about her involvement in Kingdom Hearts. Attraction Flow is something we actually could make an article out of at the present time. -
Eternal Nothingness XIII 17:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Rapunzel was probably made into a redirect (temporarily) because we have no information about her involvement in Kingdom Hearts. Attraction Flow is something we actually could make an article out of at the present time. -
I wouldn't be against making some sort of preliminary article for Attraction Flow. We've already seen at least 3 or 4 different uses of the technique, and we know what it is at a basic level. If not an actual article, at least some sort of preliminary design should be whipped up. Chitalian8 17:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- If we have enough to cobble together an article, then let's go for it. I think we do anyway, not sure about what the rest think. Otherwise, delete altogether. TRSNX 20:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- We certainly have more about Attraction Flow to make a rough article than we do the so-called "Kingdom of Corona." - Eternal Nothingness XIII 21:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, this article contains so much more content than Kingdom of Corona. But seriously, I think it would be a better idea to create articles about new KH3 features in userspace first, and move it to mainspace when it has enough information, like how a lot of other wiki's do it. TheSilentHero 11:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- We certainly have more about Attraction Flow to make a rough article than we do the so-called "Kingdom of Corona." -
