Forum:Signature policy: Difference between revisions

ENX making an IP edit
(ENX making an IP edit)
Line 90: Line 90:


Yep, I've got that. I already fixed it. {{User:IceCreamRockz/Signature}} 05:36, December 12, 2010 (UTC)
Yep, I've got that. I already fixed it. {{User:IceCreamRockz/Signature}} 05:36, December 12, 2010 (UTC)
{{EO|time=01:07, December 16, 2010 (UTC)|hooded=I agree with Kryten's standpoint on things. Some of us use the "option" feature on our signatures. The mouseover will remove any uncertainty as to who's who, and as long as your main username using the standard alphabet ("A,B,C,D...") is within the list of possible choices, I don't see how there's anything wrong with doing this.
In terms of image sizes - I've seen Wikis that don't allow images, and I've seen them with size limitations. I think it all just depends on the image you're using. An image like [[File:DL Aqua.png]] is practically unreadable at a small size. Same for [[File:DL AquaAvatar1.png]]. Keyblade images are popular in signatures and are only visible at at least 30px. Character renders are very hard to fit into signatures, and should not be used. The point I'm trying to make is that people use the images to decorate their signatures. They're just empty and extra space if you can't see them. That's why, for the sake of the community, we should create different pixel limits for each image type (Keyblades, D-Link Images, etc) rather than one applicable for all.}}
Anonymous user